2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of an Eclipsing Double White Dwarf Binary NLTT 11748

Abstract: We present high-quality ULTRACAM photometry of the eclipsing detached double white dwarf binary NLTT 11748. This system consists of a carbon/oxygen white dwarf and an extremely low mass (<0.2 M ) helium-core white dwarf in a 5.6 hr orbit. To date, such extremely low-mass white dwarfs, which can have thin, stably burning outer layers, have been modeled via poorly constrained atmosphere and cooling calculations where uncertainties in the detailed structure can strongly influence the eventual fates of these syste… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Kaplan et al (2014) show that there is significant (up to 25 per cent) disagreement between the spectroscopically determined mass of the eclipsing ELM WD NLTT 11748 and the mass derived from detailed light curve modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, Kaplan et al (2014) show that there is significant (up to 25 per cent) disagreement between the spectroscopically determined mass of the eclipsing ELM WD NLTT 11748 and the mass derived from detailed light curve modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…NLTT 11748 is discussed above; it is an eclipsing system where the spectroscopically inferred radius from the 1D models was significantly smaller than the eclipse modeling suggested (Gianninas et al 2014a;Kaplan et al 2014). Studying the radius constraints on the ELM WD sample, Gianninas et al (2014a) find that the agreement between the spectroscopically inferred radii and the model-independent values is quite good for T 10,000 eff > K. However, there are four relatively cool objects, LP 400-22, NLTT 11748, J0745, and J0751, where the radius is underestimated or the mass/ g log is overestimated.…”
Section: The Mass-radius Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1D spectroscopic analysis of Gianninas et al (2014a) Kaplan et al (2014) use high-quality photometry of NLTT 11748 to constrain the same parameters from the observed eclipses. Depending on the thickness of the surface hydrogen layer of the secondary (more massive) WD, they derive M 1 = 0.136-0.162 M e and R 1 = 0.0423-0.0433 R e .…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaplan et al 2014, and references therein). These WDs often have a massive CO WD companion and evolved via stable RLO in cataclysmic variable (CV) systems.…”
Section: Observational Properties Of Msps With He Wds In Tight Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%