2002
DOI: 10.1002/app.10021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of cellulose/PAN blend membrane

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The water flux of a cellulose/PAN blend membrane increased with the PAN content, while retention to glucosan T40 decreased. The water flux decreased and the retention increased with the whole solid content. The membrane obtained had a high ability to remove creatinine and urea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest amount of Δb occurred at 30% and 60% of CA content, so it agrees with the previous results. [16][17][18] All the Δb values listed in Table II are negative, which indicate that these blends are not miscible 19 and prove that Δb can be a good criterion for this blend solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest amount of Δb occurred at 30% and 60% of CA content, so it agrees with the previous results. [16][17][18] All the Δb values listed in Table II are negative, which indicate that these blends are not miscible 19 and prove that Δb can be a good criterion for this blend solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with polyethylvinylacetate (Girija et al 2010). Likewise, regenerated cellulose grades are blended with synthetic polymers in solutions using new kinds of non-aqueous solvent systems, like N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone/Lithium chloride (Schartel et al 1996) or N,N-dimethylacetamide/Lithium chloride (Nishio and Manley 1988;Nishio et al 1989) for blending cellulose with polyvinylalcohol, and dimethyl sulfoxide/para-formaldehyde for blending cellulose with poly-vinylpyrrolidone (Masson and Manley 1991a), poly-4-vinylpyridine (Masson and Manley 1991b), or polyacrylonitrile (He et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in this figure, the MC-g-MMA copolymer membrane has about 30%, 70%, and 60% higher FRR values than the PAN, PES, and PVDF control membranes, respectively. [26,27] These results indicate that the MC-g-MMA copolymer membrane has an enhanced protein resistance because of a reduction in protein adsorption, brought about by an increase in water affinity arising from the greater hydrophilicity of MC-g-MMA. The results also prove that the MC-g-MMA copolymer could be a good alternative high-performance material for the fabrication of separation membranes.…”
Section: Mc-g-mma Ultrafiltration Membranesmentioning
confidence: 93%