2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of concretes bearing mixed recycled aggregate with polymer-modified surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This table shows that mix M9, with 50% fMRA + 50% cMRA, is the cheapest, leading to a −8.03% decrease compared with natural aggregate (M1). This result is in line with the prior observations of other authors, who registered decreases of under −50% for recycled coarse aggregate replacement percentages between 50% and 100% [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This table shows that mix M9, with 50% fMRA + 50% cMRA, is the cheapest, leading to a −8.03% decrease compared with natural aggregate (M1). This result is in line with the prior observations of other authors, who registered decreases of under −50% for recycled coarse aggregate replacement percentages between 50% and 100% [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding the individual incorporation of fMRA (M2 and M3), we observed that these mixes experienced a larger decrease both in maximum (Pmax) and mean (Pmed) water penetration, with the decrease ending up being between 16.1% ≤ Pmax ≤ 44.6% and 47.7% ≤ Pmed ≤ 52.9% compared with conventional concrete (M1). This greater watertightness could be connected with the pozzolanic activity of ceramic fines (<0.063 mm) of the fMRA, as well as with the hydration of anhydrous cement [ 78 ] present in the fines from fMRA mortars that give them a certain hydraulic activity and thus lead to a more sealed and tortuous pore structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recycled aggregates in different regions may have significant differences in their components. The complex components of MCRA lower its density [ 10 ] and flakiness index [ 11 ] and increase its water absorption [ 12 ] and crushing index [ 13 ]. Thus, it is a challenge to reuse MCRA efficiently as a conventional aggregate [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to both: concretes containing MRA, and also, strategies for the enhancement of the properties of recycled aggregates, [113] implemented the surface treatment of MRA sourced from a CDW plant with a polymer solution (emulsified acrylic resin), and then, studied the impact of the full replacement of coarse natural aggregates by the treated (and the untreated) aggregates in concrete compositions. While studying the physical properties of the treated aggregates, the authors found that soaking the MRA in a 20% solution for 60 min yielded the best results and led to a 25% decline in water absorption and 31% decrease in the Los Ange-les coefficient (the upgrade in the properties was also confirmed by a two-way statistical analysis).…”
Section: Mixed Recycled Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%