2006
DOI: 10.1029/170gm25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of dynamic earthquake ruptures with heterogeneous stress drop

Abstract: Earthquake rupture is a notoriously complex process, at all observable scales. We introduce a simplified semi-dynamic crack model to investigate the connection between the statistical properties of stress and those of macroscopic source parameters such as rupture size, seismic moment, apparent stress drop and radiated energy. Rupture initiation is treated consistently with nucleation on a linear slipweakening fault, whereas rupture propagation and arrest are treated according to the Griffith criterion. The ava… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, apart from the probability density function (pdf), the random stress fields are controlled by the three parameters H , a c and std, where a c denotes the correlation length a c = 2 π / k c . This parameter also appears in the spectral description of von Karman fields adopted by Mai and Beroza [2002] and Ampuero et al [2006]. Variations of these three parameters will be studied in the main part of this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, apart from the probability density function (pdf), the random stress fields are controlled by the three parameters H , a c and std, where a c denotes the correlation length a c = 2 π / k c . This parameter also appears in the spectral description of von Karman fields adopted by Mai and Beroza [2002] and Ampuero et al [2006]. Variations of these three parameters will be studied in the main part of this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the nucleation of earthquakes and foreshocks driven by stress concentration near the boundaries between creeping and locked fault areas, for example at the base of the seismogenic zone; the initiation of frictional sliding near point loads in laboratory experiments (Rubinstein et al 2007;Kammer et al 2014); induced seismicity near concentrated loads generated by fluid injection (Garagash & Germanovich 2012), and the initiation of landslides by locally elevated pore pressures (Viesca & Rice 2012). The overstressed asperity initiation is admittedly a crude representation of these situations, but it encapsulates some of their key physical ingredients and hence is a basic model that can provide insight into more realistic situations, as illustrated by the work of Ampuero et al (2006) and Ripperger et al (2007).…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campillo & Ionescu 1997;Ampuero et al 2002;Uenishi & Rice 2003) established critical length scales for the onset of self-accelerating slip, but did not consider whether the rupture became indefinitely selfsustained or arrested spontaneously at some (possibly large) distance from the nucleation area. The transition from spontaneously arresting to self-sustained ruptures has been studied under slipweakening friction by Ampuero et al (2006), Viesca & Rice (2012) and Garagash & Germanovich (2012) in 2-D, and by Ripperger et al (2007) in 3-D. Our first goal is to determine the sufficient ('critical') conditions to initiate sustained ruptures, that is, ruptures on faults with uniform background stress that propagate indefinitely unless they encounter a high strength barrier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Ampuero et al (2006) and Ripperger et al (2007) explored the stochastic parameterization of initial shear stress for simulations of dynamic earthquake rupture. These papers mainly investigated the modeled rupture process on the fault plane, but because the approach ultimately aims at improving seismic hazard assessment, it is mandatory to verify the ground motions predicted by these simulations against observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%