1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.13.1900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of high-spin states inNb91andZr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 the effective charges e π = 1.6 e and e ν = 1.0 e reproduces the B(E2) value in this nucleus. These values are also well in line with those used in previous calculations in this mass region [41,44,45]. The shell-model prediction for 102,104 Cd using these effective charges are indicated with squares in Fig.…”
Section: Shell-model Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…10 the effective charges e π = 1.6 e and e ν = 1.0 e reproduces the B(E2) value in this nucleus. These values are also well in line with those used in previous calculations in this mass region [41,44,45]. The shell-model prediction for 102,104 Cd using these effective charges are indicated with squares in Fig.…”
Section: Shell-model Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The effective charges used in the current work are e π = 1.7e and e ν = 1.1e, i.e., the same effective charges as in the previous shell-model calculations with this interaction [12,13]. A former shell-model study on light Cd isotopes using v3sb by A. Ekström et al [14] (see also references [86][87][88]) successfully reproduced the experimental values with similar effective charges.…”
Section: Shell Model Calculationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Seniority-three 21/2 + isomers were earlier observed in neighbouring nuclei with N = 50 [6], N = 49 [7][8][9] and N=48 [10]. It seems to be of interest to extend this systematics also to 87y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Inserting this ratio (5) in expression (4) it can be easily calculated (i.e. with mixing) R~,X = B (E 2, 21/2 + ~ 17/2 + ) = 1.04 (6) B(E2, 8+~6 +) what is already closer to the experiment compared to (2). Thereby, the contributions Ca ( In any case, it can be concluded that the dominating part of the E2 strength between seniority-three (vgg/~) (~g~/z) and (ngZ/z)(vgff/2) configurations, respectively, arises from transitions between the corresponding seniority-two core structures.…”
Section: B(e2 8+06 +)mentioning
confidence: 99%