2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-461x(2000)80:4/5<567::aid-qua5>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of isomers of the cluster Ni8 from density functional studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,20,43 As is often the case, LDA values of the BE are larger than calculated at the GGA level and concomitantly bond distances are shorter. 1,5,16,28 Our calculated vertical and adiabatic IP (BP) values of the bare Ni 3 cluster, 6.48 and 6.29 eV, respectively, are 0.2-0.4 eV larger than experimental results of Knickelbein et al, 44 6.09 eV, and Watanabe, 45 6.12-6.16 eV. The vertical IP value calculated by Reddy et al, 30 6.38 eV, obtained with the frozencore GGA approach agrees with the present result, whereas the result of Pastor et al, 46 IP ) 6.2 eV, is closest to experiment, but was obtained with a tight-binding method without geometry optimization, using Ni-Ni distances fixed at the bulk nearestneighbor value, 249.2 pm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17,20,43 As is often the case, LDA values of the BE are larger than calculated at the GGA level and concomitantly bond distances are shorter. 1,5,16,28 Our calculated vertical and adiabatic IP (BP) values of the bare Ni 3 cluster, 6.48 and 6.29 eV, respectively, are 0.2-0.4 eV larger than experimental results of Knickelbein et al, 44 6.09 eV, and Watanabe, 45 6.12-6.16 eV. The vertical IP value calculated by Reddy et al, 30 6.38 eV, obtained with the frozencore GGA approach agrees with the present result, whereas the result of Pastor et al, 46 IP ) 6.2 eV, is closest to experiment, but was obtained with a tight-binding method without geometry optimization, using Ni-Ni distances fixed at the bulk nearestneighbor value, 249.2 pm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Previous calculations showed that the cluster Ni 3 forms essentially an equilateral triangle with a Ni-Ni distance between 215 and 224 pm, depending on the employed computational approach (see Section IV.D). 30 As an initial step in our study, we also optimized the structure of bare Ni 3 with 16 (a 2 ′) 5 (e′) 40 (a 1 ′′) 1 (a 2 ′′) 6 (e′′) 16 with R(Ni-Ni) ) 223.2 pm and (a 1 ′) 16 (a 2 ′) 5 (e′) 39 (a 1 ′′) 2 (a 2 ′′) 6 (e′′) 16 with R(Ni-Ni) ) 225.6 pm. The electronic configuration (a 1 ) 36 (a 2 ) 9 (b 1 ) 14 (b 2 ) 25 in C 2V corresponds to the former configuration in D 3h symmetry; 32 it features the same BE per Ni atom, 175 kJ/mol, and a similar geometry: 33 Hence the two structures can be considered as equivalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computational approaches also help to clarify bonding and magnetic properties of clusters as well as the spectral features of these systems [2][3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] A model study of isomers of Ni 8 clearly suggested that such small transition metal clusters are rather flexible and have several isomers of similar stability. 19 Experimental information is even scarcer for metal clusters that contain impurities, especially non-metal atoms, because preparation and characterization of such clusters is more complicated. In the present work, we considered how single H, C, or O impurity atoms affect the structure and other properties of Ni 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas bare nickel clusters are magnetic [43][44][45][46], coordination of CO ligands leads to a reduction the magnetism or even to a complete quenching if all metal atoms are coordinated by a sufficient number of ligands, e.g. [Ni 6 (CO) 12 ] 2À or [Ni 48 Pt 6 (CO) 12 ] nÀ .…”
Section: Effect On the Cluster Magnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%