1988
DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90047-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
210
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
210
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A random permuted block design was used for randomization of participants in a 4‐to‐3 ratio with randomly varying block size [Matts and Lachin, 1988]. Children and parents were blinded to group allocation; for practical reasons, this was not possible for researchers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random permuted block design was used for randomization of participants in a 4‐to‐3 ratio with randomly varying block size [Matts and Lachin, 1988]. Children and parents were blinded to group allocation; for practical reasons, this was not possible for researchers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospectively generated permuted block randomization 12 using four blocks of size four each and an allocation ratio of 3:1 within each block (treatment:no treatment) was used to create three dose cohorts of five to six patients each. In each dose cohort, four patients were randomized to IDDD implantation plus administration of idursulfase-IT once monthly (every 28 ± 7 days) for 6 months, and in each dose cohort one or two patients were randomized to no treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a permuted-block algorithm and random block [ 30 ] , fifty-two participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Twenty-five participants were allocated into the control group and twenty-seven into the treatment group.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%