Properties of Serial Ultrasound Clinical Diagnostic Pathway in Suspected Appendicitis and Related Computed Tomography Use

Schuh, Suzanne; Langer, Jacob C.; Kulik, Dina M.; Preto-Zamperlini, Marcela; Aswad, Nadine Al; Man, Carina; Mohanta, Arun; Stephens, Derek; Doria, A.

doi:10.1111/acem.12631

Cited by 59 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings in present study were comparable with findings of Schuh S et al and many other studies. 18 However, some of the studies have integrated other parameters like CRP with USG and increases the sensitivity and specificity which is contrary to the findings in present study. 19 In present study, the utility of ultrasound has been advocated as an adjunct to improve diagnosis in equivocal cases and determines further who needs further imaging with superior modality.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 95%

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis by Alvarado scoring with ultrasonography as supportive tool

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Acute appendicitis remains as one of the most common surgical entity requiring early intervention. Delay in management results in complications and misdiagnosis results in negative appendectomy. Hence there is always a need to develop a well-designed protocol for diagnosis and to reduce negative appendectomy. Alvarado score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis is an easy, affordable and diagnostic which has been evaluated early with variable reports. In cases with equivocal score, additional tools like sonography may provide a reliable result in accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado score and ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. To determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of ultrasonography in cases operated with histopathological correlation.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at our hospital by department of general surgery for a period of six months. All suspected cases of appendicitis were scored by Alvarado score and cases with>5 were performed additional USG for further evaluation. All the cases of appendicitis that underwent surgery were further confirmed by histopathological correlation with USG and clinical Alvarado score.Results: A total of 200 cases were enrolled with male predominance (57.5%) and mean age of study group was 34.26±8.64 years and male to female ratio of 1.3:1.69% of cases presented with Alvarado score of 7 and above, while 21% of cases with 5-6. Migratory pain in RIF was the commonest symptom and tenderness RIF was the most common sign.160 cases (80%) were operated totally with 75% cases lap appendectomy and 25% cases by open appendectomy. USG was performed on 160 cases and 146 were positive and 14 were negative whereas histopathologically 142 cases were confirmed as Acute appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of USG is 97.18%, 55.56%, 94.52% and 71.43%. The accuracy of USG is 92.5.Conclusions: Acute appendicitis is first and foremost a clinical diagnosis with scoring systems and imaging being necessary adjuncts in equivocal cases. USG is an easily available tool in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Application of USG as adjunct tool to Alvarado scoring improves the diagnostic accuracy.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 95%

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis by Alvarado scoring with ultrasonography as supportive tool

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar to our study, Schuh et al reported a suboptimal accuracy rate (60%) of screening with ultrasound scanning for appendicitis (21). Recent study showed that the serial US has a higher diagnostic accuracy than initial US (22). First reason for our lower specificity and accuracy may be due to using only initial US in ED.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Evaluation of Clinical and Imaging Findings in Children with Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study is an evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), and Alvarado score (AS) in the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in children. Methods: Records of pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) between 2008 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Patient data from the national electronic health information system was screened and those with complete clinical and imaging findings (AS, preoperative USG and/or CT images) and postoperative pathological diagnosis were included in the study. Results: Study group consisted of 449 children with diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis aged between 3 and 15 years (mean age: 9.20 ± 2.73 years). Of the total, 428 (95.3%) patients underwent appendectomy and 21 (4.7%) cases were treated conservatively. Mean duration of symptoms was 4.94 ± 1.84 hours. Pathological evaluation results were negative (i.e., removal of normal appendix) in 36 (8.4%) patients; histopathological diagnosis was acute appendicitis in 392 (91.6%) patients. Perforated appendix was found in 38 (8.5%) patients. In patients with histopathologically confirmed appendicitis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CT in diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 96.3%, 55.6%, 92.8%, and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of USG were 73.5%, 22.2%, 91.1%, and 69.2%, respectively. Negative appendectomy rate was 6.4% (n = 8) in patients who had preoperative CT scan, and 6.5% (n = 28) in patients who had USG examination. Conclusions: CT has higher sensitivity than USG in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. USG, on the other hand, is widely accessible method and does not use ionizing radiation. Therefore, it may be used as initial radiological imaging method in acute appendicitis. Thin-filter, contrast-unenhanced CT scans may be preferred in cases where clinical signs and USG findings are unclear or controversial.

show abstract

“…This diagnostic modality does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation and is currently recommended by the American College of Radiology following an equivocal US in pregnant women (5). A second US examination could also be considered as a follow-up imaging technique (8,11). It is expected that the second US may have a better diagnostic performance compared with the initial US because the progression of the inflammatory process in the appendix would make it easier to be detected.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as Second-Line Imaging Tests after an Initial US

Eng¹,

Abadeh

Ligocki³

et al. 2018

Radiology

Self Cite

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging modalities after initial US for assessing acute appendicitis in children and adults. Materials and Methods A literature search was conducted in Medline and Embase to identify articles that used surgery or histopathologic examination alone or in combination with clinical follow-up or chart review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of second-line imaging modalities. The quality of articles was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy tools. Results For studies of children, the number of studies and patients were as follows: US, six studies and 548 patients; CT, nine studies and 1498 patients; MRI, five studies and 287 patients. For studies of adults, the number of studies and patients were as follows: US, three studies and 169 patients; CT, 11 studies and 1027 patients; MRI, six studies and 427 patients. Pooled sensitivities and specificities of second-line US for diagnosis of appendicitis in children were 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.8%, 95.5%) and 95.2% (95% CI: 91.8%, 97.3%), respectively; and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 83.1% (95% CI: 70.3%, 91.1%) and 90.9% (95% CI: 59.3%, 98.6%), respectively. Regarding second-line CT in children, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 96.2% (95% CI: 93.2%, 97.8%) and 94.6% (95% CI: 92.8%, 95.9%); and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 89.9% (95% CI: 85.4%, 93.2%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 91.2%, 95.3%), respectively. Regarding second-line MRI in children, pooled sensitivities and specificities were 97.4% (95% CI: 85.8%, 100%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 92.1%, 99.0%); and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 89.9% (95% CI: 84.8%, 93.5%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 90.9%, 95.5%), respectively. Conclusion Second-line US, CT, and MRI have comparable and high accuracy in helping to diagnose appendicitis in children and adults, including pregnant women. All three modalities may be valid as second-line imaging in a clinical imaging pathway for diagnosis and management of appendicitis.

show abstract

Properties of Serial Ultrasound Clinical Diagnostic Pathway in Suspected Appendicitis and Related Computed Tomography Use

Cited by 59 publications

References 58 publications

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis by Alvarado scoring with ultrasonography as supportive tool

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis by Alvarado scoring with ultrasonography as supportive tool

Evaluation of Clinical and Imaging Findings in Children with Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as Second-Line Imaging Tests after an Initial US

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About