Properties of solid state devices with significant impurity hopping conduction

Abstract

A device of the form metal1 |semiconductor| metal2 is discussed, in which the semiconductor is assumed to be p-type, donors are not present, yet electron hopping in the impurity band is possible due to partial occupancy. The two electrodes (metal1 and metal2) are assumed to be asymmetric (contact potentials wise) one leading to depletion and the other one with zero contact potential. The defect distribution and I–V relations are solved numerically assuming steady state. The effects of sample thickness, ionization–recombination reaction constant, recombination rate and hopping mobility are discussed. Different thicknesses, from nano to macro, are considered. The results are compared with a classical model in which the acceptors are fully ionized and no hopping is possible. The classical model is equivalent to a device with a Schottky junction on one side. The question of the existence of regions with local neutrality (l.n.) is discussed, and the concentration profile there is solved for the cases of strict l.n. and quasi-local neutrality.It is found that the sample thickness and ionization–recombination reaction constant have significant effects on the I–V relations of this device, whereas the hopping mobility and recombination time have a lesser effect. A comparison with the classical model shows that though the addition of the hopping conduction mechanism may have a significant effect on the defect distribution, the effects on the I–V relations are usually quantitative only, and not qualitative, as long as the ionization–recombination reaction constant is not too high. Hence, investigating the I–V relations is not sufficient to decide if hopping occurs in a sample. To distinguish between the classical model and the present model, one needs further experimental knowledge about the sample in question.

Parallel Band and Hopping Electron Transport in SrTiO3

“…The current due to electron hopping through localized defect states within the band gap is given by the following equation: [ 31 ] …”

NonlinearI–Vrelations and hysteresis in solid state devices based on oxide mixed-ionic–electronic conductors

“…The hopping of electrons between ionic defects quasi-imitates ionic conductivity except that the electrodes cannot block the current, as it is electronic. Indeed, simulations show significant similarities in the I -V relation when an MIEC is replaced by a material with frozen ionic defects but with defect band conduction [21].…”

Mechanical Switching of Ferroelectric Domains in 33‐200 nm‐Thick Sol‐Gel‐Grown PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3 Films Assisted by Nanocavities

“…This electric field can be created by the flexoelectric effect (thus related to the stress gradient) or bulk electrochemical effects. [ 22 ] The large strain imposed by the AFM tip applying a few μN over a very small surface leads to a huge non‐uniform stress, and either to a possible large electric field created from flexoelectricity, [ 23 ] or to a high degree of mobility of ionic species like oxygen vacancies, [ 24–26 ] which contributes to the onset of the electric field. This is consistent with the fact that the polarization can only be reversed in a unique direction : only compression is possible with an AFM tip, and the created electric field is always in the same direction.…”