2016
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/25/7/077804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of strong-coupling magneto-bipolaron qubit in quantum dot under magnetic field

Abstract: Based on the variational method of Pekar type, we study the energies and the wave-functions of the ground and the first-excited states of magneto-bipolaron, which is strongly coupled to the LO phonon in a parabolic potential quantum dot under an applied magnetic field, thus built up a quantum dot magneto-bipolaron qubit. The results show that the oscillation period of the probability density of the two electrons in the qubit decreases with increasing electron-phonon coupling strength α, resonant frequency of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to increase the lifespan of the qubit it is necessary to choose materials that have low EPC ( ) a for the manufacture of QDs. result in agreement with the following study [21,22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to increase the lifespan of the qubit it is necessary to choose materials that have low EPC ( ) a for the manufacture of QDs. result in agreement with the following study [21,22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In summary, whether we are in the presence of a magnetic field or electronic field the probability of electron appearing near the center of the quantum dot is larger, while that appearing away from the center of the quantum dot is much smaller. These results are in agreement with the results of Zhang ying [21] and Xu-Fang Bai [22]. It is interesting now to show the cumulative effect of electric and magnetic fields on the electron probability density then compare with previous studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation