Abstract. This study extends the observations on the defects in pseudopod formation of ABP-120 + and ABP-120-cells by a detailed morphological and biochemical analysis of the actin based cytoskeleton. Both ABP-120 + and ABP-120-cells polymerize the same amount of F-actin in response to stimulation with cAMP. However, unlike ABP-120 ÷ cells, ABP-120-cells do not incorporate actin into the Triton X-100-insoluble cytoskeleton at 30-50 s, the time when ABP-120 is incorporated into the cytoskeleton and when pseudopods are extended after cAMP stimulation in wild-type cells. By confocal and electron microscopy, pseudopods extended by ABP-120-cells are not as large or thick as those produced by ABP-120 + cells and in the electron microscope, an altered filament network is found in pseudopods of ABP-120-cells when compared to pseudopods of ABP-120 ÷ cells. The actin filaments found in areas of pseudopods in ABP-120 ÷ cells either before or after stimulation were long, straight, and arranged into space filling orthogonal networks. Protrusions of ABP-120-cells are less three-dimensional, denser, and filled with multiple foci of aggregated filaments consistent with collapse of the filament network due to the absence of ABP-120-mediated cross-linking activity. The different organization of actin filaments may account for the diminished size of protrusions observed in living and fixed ABP-120-cells compared to ABP-120 ÷ cells and is consistent with the role of ABP-120 in regulating pseudopod extension through its crosslinking of actin filaments. p SEUDOPOD extension is an essential feature of many types of cell locomotion. Amoeboid cells in particular are well known for their reliance on pseudopod extension for locomotion. In chemotactic amoebae such as Dictyostelium discoideum, pseudopod extension appears to be a primary event in the reorganization of cytoskeletal polarity that is required for chemotaxis. Despite the demonstrated or suspected importance of the pseudopod in many cell types and after extensive study, modern cell biology has had difficulty in distinguishing definitively among the three general actin based models for how pseudopods are extended (Cooper, 1991;Egelhoff and Spudich, 1991;Condeelis, 1992;Fukui 1993;Lee et al., 1993;Oster and Perelson, 1995;Zigmond, 1993).Part of the problem arises from the complexity of the actin cytoskeleton which contains a multitude of actin binding proteins potentially involved in the temporal and spatial conThe data in this paper are from a thesis to be submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree trol of actin polymerization, filament cross-linking, and sliding (Hartwig and Kwiatkowski, 1991;Luna and Hitt, 1992;Condeelis, 1993a). Taking advantage of model cell populations that exhibit protrusive activity and extend pseudopods synchronously in response to defined stimulation, such as platelets (Hartwig, 1992), neutrophils (Omann, 1987), and Dictyostelium (Condeelis, 1993b), a subset of actin binding proteins specifically involved in pseudopod extension ha...