2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of tooth enamel in great apes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, Shore-D durometers cannot accurately assess H in materials that tend to be relatively soft. However, research on primate feeding behaviors has shown that food items in the extreme high end of hardness and stiffness-even if less preferred (i.e., ''fallback foods'')-are hypothesized to be the major drivers of primate masticatory anatomy (Kay, 1981;Kinzey and Norconk, 1990;Lambert et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2010). Thus, while the accurate sampling range for Shore-D durometers may not capture data in the softer range of a primate's diet, Shore-D durometers are capable of characterizing the hardness and stiffness of the food materials that are most mechanically challenging to consume and may therefore underlie feeding selective pressures.…”
Section: Darvell or Lucas Testers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, Shore-D durometers cannot accurately assess H in materials that tend to be relatively soft. However, research on primate feeding behaviors has shown that food items in the extreme high end of hardness and stiffness-even if less preferred (i.e., ''fallback foods'')-are hypothesized to be the major drivers of primate masticatory anatomy (Kay, 1981;Kinzey and Norconk, 1990;Lambert et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2010). Thus, while the accurate sampling range for Shore-D durometers may not capture data in the softer range of a primate's diet, Shore-D durometers are capable of characterizing the hardness and stiffness of the food materials that are most mechanically challenging to consume and may therefore underlie feeding selective pressures.…”
Section: Darvell or Lucas Testers)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, if selection acts to minimize strain energy absorbed by the food item or to maximize tensile stress in the enamel, there should be a narrower range of RoCs among species that consume large food items and a broader range of RoCs among species that consume small food items. Pongo pygmaeus is known to be a seed predator, and consumes relatively large Mezzettia seeds [40,[52][53][54]. It also has a large coefficient of variation in tooth cusp RoC measurements, the largest of all the great apes (refer to table 2 [13]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tooth size and morphology are other important factors in the evaluation of critical failure load. A comparison of failure loads in a study of different primate teeth showed that the general mechanical properties (elastic modulus and hardness) of primates' enamel are not significantly different and that the critical failure loads are only a function of teeth morphology and enamel thickness [36].…”
Section: On the Fracture Resistance Of Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%