2001
DOI: 10.1080/713601100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property Rights and the Role of the State: Evidence from the Horn of Africa

Abstract: This study applies extant theories of property rights change to three land tenure systems in Imperial Ethiopia. Two of the areas underwent changes in property rights after experiencing changes in the value of land; one did not. A data set of litigation over land rights is used in conjunction with case studies to understand the mechanisms motivating or impeding property rights change. Amendments to the role of the state are suggested and two conclusions are reached: (1) that movement towards greater specificity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pastoral areas, it also established state ranches, set up settlement programmes for pastoralists, introduced forced livestock sales, enforced a ban on bushfires, and provided special support for cultivation. Although some of these policies have been repealed since the early 1990s, there is evidence of disruption of the social system and values of mobile pastoralism, to which current resource conflicts are strongly hypothesised as being related (Coppock, 1994: 39;Joireman, 2001;Swallow and Kamara, 1999: 244).…”
Section: Level Of Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pastoral areas, it also established state ranches, set up settlement programmes for pastoralists, introduced forced livestock sales, enforced a ban on bushfires, and provided special support for cultivation. Although some of these policies have been repealed since the early 1990s, there is evidence of disruption of the social system and values of mobile pastoralism, to which current resource conflicts are strongly hypothesised as being related (Coppock, 1994: 39;Joireman, 2001;Swallow and Kamara, 1999: 244).…”
Section: Level Of Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we do not entirely discount the validity of such arguments, there are reasons to believe that the situation may be different when the land is state‐owned. In such a context, land tenure arrangements can be precarious in guaranteeing security to the user (Rahmato, 1992), and any endogenous change in property rights may be blocked by the state (Joireman, 2001). Hence, others have emphasized the relative role of expected profits to farm level adoption and the maintenance of soil conservation practices (Place and Swallow, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the appellation of serfdom for these relations (Donham 1986;Joireman 2001), there is a sensible economic explanation for it. Tribute and service obligations of the southern gebbar were initially 'collective' rather than individual precisely because the imperial state lacked the administrative capacity to centralize the assessment and collection of tax obligations -especially in an empire whose size doubled in a matter of two decades.…”
Section: Some Illustrative Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the possession of one's full entitlements to rist land depended crucially on one's ability to mount effective defence against a multitude of legitimate and illegitimate claimants, especially the titled overlord class. Investment in tenure claims, therefore, had handsome payoffs (Hoben 1973;Joireman 2001).…”
Section: Rist and Gultmentioning
confidence: 99%