2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1611::aid-cncr27>3.3.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic action of oral fluconazole against fungal infection in neutropenic patients

Abstract: The current analyses failed to find an effect of fluconazole on both fatal fungal infection and systemic fungal infection in non-BMT patients. Further studies on severely neutropenic patients are warranted because prophylactic fluconazole seemed to be effective when the incidence of systemic fungal infection was expected to be > 15%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
2
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
78
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many studies have strongly recommended highdose (400 mg/day) fluconazole prophylaxis, [23][24][25] there are also several studies that have used lower dose (50-200 mg/ day). [26][27][28][29][30] The predominance of mold form and few yeast infections despite low-dose fluconazole prophylaxis at our Table 4 Causes of death during three recovery phases after transplant Infection after allogeneic HSCT in Korea J-H Yoo et al institution was not clearly explainable. This should be elucidated further in the future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although many studies have strongly recommended highdose (400 mg/day) fluconazole prophylaxis, [23][24][25] there are also several studies that have used lower dose (50-200 mg/ day). [26][27][28][29][30] The predominance of mold form and few yeast infections despite low-dose fluconazole prophylaxis at our Table 4 Causes of death during three recovery phases after transplant Infection after allogeneic HSCT in Korea J-H Yoo et al institution was not clearly explainable. This should be elucidated further in the future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One patient received it prophylactically as a result of persistent fever beyond day five. A multicenter randomized trial by Winston et al 17 and a meta-analysis of sixteen randomized trials published by Kanda et al 18 …”
Section: Choice Of Antimicrobial Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Despite the lack of prospective clinical trials comparing different approaches, primary antifungal prophylaxis is widely used in most of the centers for high-risk patients. The prophylactic use of fluconazole has been shown to reduce the incidence of invasive candidiasis and improve survival; 14 however, this agent is not active against the filamentous fungi, Aspergillus, and has therefore led to an increase in the frequency of invasive aspergillosis with extremely high mortality. 2,3,15 The introduction of new and safe antifungal agents has lead to the design of prophylactic prospective controlled trials, [16][17][18] but most published studies include few if any pediatric patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%