2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05431-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic acupuncture treatment during chemotherapy with breast cancer: a randomized pragmatic trial with a retrospective nested qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of side effects suggests a better QoL; nevertheless, a better QoL in the acupuncture group than in the control group was not observed in either the qualitative or the quantitative study, with most women in both groups reporting a better QoL than expected beforehand. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reduction of side effects suggests a better QoL; nevertheless, a better QoL in the acupuncture group than in the control group was not observed in either the qualitative or the quantitative study, with most women in both groups reporting a better QoL than expected beforehand. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each treatment group (acupuncture treatments in addition to standard care and standard care alone) within our pragmatic RCT trial, 5 responders and 5 non-responders were randomly selected according to the results of the RCT as following ( Table 1 ): Responder and non-responder were defined by the results of the primary outcome, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) total score after 6 months. 22 , 24 A responder was defined as a patient whose FACT-B total score has increased or decreased less than 7 points after 6 months. The randomization for the interviews followed the chemotherapy regime in subsequent order, including patients with completed FACT-B questionnaires at baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…58,65,92 Finally, 62 studies were included in the meta-analyses. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][59][60][61][62][63][64][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106]136 Of those, 29 RCTs were included in meta-analyses for acupuncture versus sham control, 45,46,48,49,52,53,55,57,59,66,68,70,72,75,77-80,82,88-90, 94,96,97,99,102,103,107 25 RCTs were included in meta-analyses for acupuncture versus TAU/waitlist control, 46,47,[49][50][51]54,56,62,64,…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%