2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Antibiotics Are Not Needed Following Rattlesnake Bites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in Ecuador, a controlled study suggests that chloramphenicol and gentamicin were ineffective in preventing abscess formation (9 cases among 114 snake bites) given that they are administered for 24 h and less than half of the patients are identified as Bothrops bites [26]. In the United States, prophylactic antibiotic administration is not recommended for treating rattlesnake bites given the low incidence of wound infection (0.98%) [27]. Although the administration of specific antivenom remains the standard of care in the management of snakebites, administration of prophylactic, empiric antibiotics, or both is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in Ecuador, a controlled study suggests that chloramphenicol and gentamicin were ineffective in preventing abscess formation (9 cases among 114 snake bites) given that they are administered for 24 h and less than half of the patients are identified as Bothrops bites [26]. In the United States, prophylactic antibiotic administration is not recommended for treating rattlesnake bites given the low incidence of wound infection (0.98%) [27]. Although the administration of specific antivenom remains the standard of care in the management of snakebites, administration of prophylactic, empiric antibiotics, or both is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three bacterial species recovered from deep tissue or biopsy cultures were also present in the oropharynx swab culture of N. atra, which suggests the requirement of simultaneous determination of both the bite wound and snake oropharynx bacterial microbiota. Given the considerable variability in the incidence of infection in snake bite wounds (1%-81%) [35,36], the causative organisms, and the methods used to isolate a pathogen in variable clinical settings [5,10,27,[37][38][39], an institutional protocol for antibiotic selection during snake bite wound management should be adapted based on the regional microbiology data of both snake bite wounds and snakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the snake should be detached from the bitten area as fast as possible, as this contributes to decreasing the chance of toxin release and breakthrough into the tissues. Likewise, in accidents caused by colubrids, even in accidents by viperid or elapid snakes, the secondary infection of the wound occurs in around 1% of the cases, likely due to the antimicrobial effect of the venom, which explains why no prophylactic antibiotics are used 21 . The use of antibiotics should be supported in microbiological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, most of our patients received antibiotics and corticosteroids, which were also used in previous studies 2,5 . However, no evidence has been presented to back the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, as these are only recommended if there are clinical signs of a wound infection 21,22 . There has also been a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the use of corticosteroids 9,16,23,24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%