2020
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Endoscopic Clipping Does Not Prevent Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding in Routine Clinical Practice: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

Abstract: Introduction: Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a relatively common adverse event. Evidence is conflicting on the efficacy of prophylactic clipping to prevent DPPB, and real-world effectiveness data are lacking. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of prophylactic clipping in preventing DPPB in a large screening-related cohort. METHODS: We manually reviewed records of patients who underwent polypectomy from 2008 to 2014 at a screening facili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This IPDMA involving 8229 colorectal polyps from 13 studies shows that prophylactic clipping in general did Our findings are in accordance with recent studies on prophylactic clipping that concluded that prophylactic clipping should not be routinely performed after polyp resection in the whole colon, but should be considered for bleeding prevention after large proximal polyp resection. 8,9,12,26,30,31 Based on this, it can well be concluded that in a setting where cost issues do not play an important role, all proximal polyps 20 mm may be routinely clipped. Nonetheless, costs considerations often are an important factor in general care settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This IPDMA involving 8229 colorectal polyps from 13 studies shows that prophylactic clipping in general did Our findings are in accordance with recent studies on prophylactic clipping that concluded that prophylactic clipping should not be routinely performed after polyp resection in the whole colon, but should be considered for bleeding prevention after large proximal polyp resection. 8,9,12,26,30,31 Based on this, it can well be concluded that in a setting where cost issues do not play an important role, all proximal polyps 20 mm may be routinely clipped. Nonetheless, costs considerations often are an important factor in general care settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a large cohort study in which the incidence of DPB was retrospectively analyzed in >8300 procedures performed by 47 endoscopists, clipping did not prevent DPB even in proximal polyps >20 mm. 8 Although clearly this is a different population, these real-world data may also partly be explained by the difference in skillset of endoscopists in nonexpert centers because closure of large postpolypectomy defects can be technically very challenging. To emphasize this point, in a recent study in almost 250 patients undergoing piecemeal EMR of polyps >20 mm, complete closure of the defect could not be achieved in >40% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright ª 2021 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 0016-5107/$36.00 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.08.026 rates of bleeding after polypectomy 13,14 and sphincterotomy. 15,16 The authors noted nonadherence to practice guidelines in 23.8% of patients, including aspirin being withheld despite being used for secondary prevention, 1 high-risk patient using vitamin K antagonist who did not receive bridge therapy, and patients using antiplatelet therapy or DOACs who were given bridge therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%