Introduction:
Lateral humeral condyle (LC) fractures are the second most common pediatric elbow fractures. Traditionally, displaced fractures have been treated with open reduction although recent studies have demonstrated successful outcomes of closed reduction for similar injuries. This study investigates the outcomes comparing open and closed reduction in a large cohort of children with moderately displaced (Song classification types 1 to 4) lateral humeral condyle fractures.
Methods:
Retrospective data from patients aged between 1 and 12 years treated for lateral condyle fractures was collected from 6 academic level 1 trauma centers between 2005 and 2019. Data was collected on patient demographics, radiographic parameters, reduction type, type of hardware fixation, and fracture patterns. Complications recorded include infections, reoperations for nonunion, osteonecrosis, and elbow stiffness.
Results:
An initial 762 fractures were identified. After excluding Song 5 cases, a total of 480 fractures met inclusion criteria, with 202 (42%) treated with closed reduction and 278 (58%) treated with open reduction. Demographics and injury characteristics were similar across the 2 reduction cohorts. After propensity score matching, delayed healing (52% vs. 28%; OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.97-4.22; P<0.0001) and stiffness (22% vs. 10%; OR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.42-4.13; P=0.0012) were significantly higher in the open reduction group. No differences in the rates of infection or nonunion (3% CR and 1% OR) were noted between the 2 groups.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that moderately displaced lateral condyle fractures requiring open reduction are more likely to have elbow stiffness and delayed healing when compared with the ones treated with closed reduction. For these reasons, we propose attempting closed reduction techniques as the first line of treatment in moderately displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures (if anatomic articular reduction can be achieved) to attain better patient outcomes.
