2015
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-15-0122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Before Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Reduces Perioperative Medical Expenses and Improves Postoperative Clinical Course in INTERMACS Profile 2 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 However, these treatments are often painful and stressful and can depress patients. 3, 4 In Japan, Waon therapy 5-7 has been commonly used to treat such patients for >20 years. It is indicated as Class I for patients with chronic HF in the Japanese guideline.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, these treatments are often painful and stressful and can depress patients. 3, 4 In Japan, Waon therapy 5-7 has been commonly used to treat such patients for >20 years. It is indicated as Class I for patients with chronic HF in the Japanese guideline.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery of end-organ function is beneficial even in patients who undergo VAD implantation, because it improves the post-VAD prognosis. 28,30) Long-term prognosis relating to cardiac replacement therapy: Previous studies showed the prognosis of ASV therapy by assessing the surrogate markers during a short-or midterm study period (< 1 year), whereas we showed the advantage of ASV therapy in terms of 2-year survival rate and VADfree survival rate. Considering the hazard ratio of 2.067 for continuous ASV therapy in relation to the 2-year VAD-free survival rate, ASV therapy seems to be effective from the viewpoint of delaying the timing of VAD implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The use of preoperative IABP in high-risk patients reduces the length of hospital stay compared to patients with IABP installed after surgery or when unused [11] [13]- [15]. The length of stay for this study is within of the average found in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On this study, the good postoperative evolution, joint by LVEF improvement and LVDD reduction, although without statistical relevance, suggests that there is benefit in the strategy that link preoperative IABP and myocardium revascularization, even though it cannot be disposed that the hemodynamic improvement occurred only by revascularization. Last year, some studies observed that the mortality of the patients who received IABP in the preoperative of the myocardium revascularization surgery was 13.6%, while the mortality in patients who received the balloon in the trans or post-operative was, approximately, 35% [15]- [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%