Prophylactic radiotherapy for the prevention of procedure-tract metastases after surgical and large-bore pleural procedures in malignant pleural mesothelioma (SMART): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial
Abstract:SummaryBackgroundThe use of prophylactic radiotherapy to prevent procedure-tract metastases (PTMs) in malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial, and clinical practice varies worldwide. We aimed to compare prophylactic radiotherapy with deferred radiotherapy (given only when a PTM developed) in a suitably powered trial.MethodsWe did a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in 22 UK hospitals of patients with histocytologically proven mesothelioma who had undergone large-bore pl… Show more
“…The SMART trial was a randomised, multicentre, phase III trial evaluating whether prophylactic radiotherapy reduces the incidence of procedure tract metastases after surgical and large bore pleural procedures 129 . Eligible patients were recruited from 22 UK hospitals and randomised (1:1) to immediate radiotherapy (21 Gy in three fractions over three working days), or deferred radiotherapy (same dose given if a procedure tract metastasis (PTM) developed).…”
“…The SMART trial was a randomised, multicentre, phase III trial evaluating whether prophylactic radiotherapy reduces the incidence of procedure tract metastases after surgical and large bore pleural procedures 129 . Eligible patients were recruited from 22 UK hospitals and randomised (1:1) to immediate radiotherapy (21 Gy in three fractions over three working days), or deferred radiotherapy (same dose given if a procedure tract metastasis (PTM) developed).…”
“…A recommendation from this study is to strongly consider port side radiation post procedure in patients with mesothelioma to decrease the risk of tract tumor seeding with malignant cells (48). Recent studies have shown no benefit of routine use of prophylactic radiotherapy following pleural interventions in patients with malignant mesothelioma (49,50). Figure 6 shows a modified diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected MPE.…”
Section: Mt and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (Vats)mentioning
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a known complication of both thoracic and extra thoracic malignancies. The presence of MPE regardless of the primary site translates into advanced stage disease.Diagnosis and management of MPE with the goals of palliation and improving quality of life poses a challenge for chest physicians. Recently, multiple studies have made attempts to answer questions regarding optimal management in various clinical scenarios. We will review the current evidence and available options for the management of MPE.
“…Prior studies have reported that pain related to procedure-tract metastasis is generally mild to moderate in intensity and is responsive to treatment [21, 42, 45]. Although the incidence of CTM was higher than previously reported, we would not recommend avoidance of IPCs due to the clear symptomatic benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The 2016 SMART trial by Clive et al [42], which included 25 patients (12%) with IPCs, compared immediate (prophylactic) radiotherapy to deferred radiotherapy (following diagnosis of tract metastasis). There was no difference in quality of life, chest pain, analgesia requirement, or overall development of procedure tract metastasis between groups.…”
Background: Use of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) for the management of symptomatic pleural effusions in patients with mesothelioma has increased in popularity. An important concern with this approach is the potential for the development of catheter tract metastasis (CTM). Objectives: To determine the incidence of IPC-related CTM in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with biopsy-confirmed MPM who had an IPC inserted between May 2006 and July 2017 were identified from a prospectively collected database. Thoracic CT scans following IPC insertion were reviewed to assess for evidence of CTM. Patients were followed until death or last documented patient encounter with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the cohort. CTM was identified in 23 of 90 patients (26%). Median time from IPC insertion to CTM was 408 days (interquartile range 196–721 days). Medical thoracoscopy at the time of IPC insertion did not lead to a significantly increased odds of CTM (OR 2.30; 95% CI 0.66–7.94; p = 0.19). Incidence of CTM was not different between mesothelioma subtypes (p = 0.09). Patient-reported dyspnea scores were improved following IPC insertion in 80% of patients. Conclusions: CTM was identified in over a quarter of MPM patients when follow-up imaging was reviewed. Treating physicians should be cognizant of the possibility of CTM at the site of prior IPC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.