1988
DOI: 10.1056/nejm198803313181304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Sclerotherapy of Large Esophageal Varices

Abstract: We randomly assigned 95 patients with large esophageal varices (Grade 3 or 4) who had not previously had upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding to two groups: 49 received intravariceal sclerotherapy, and 46 were followed as controls. Over a mean follow-up of 13 months there was no difference between the sclerotherapy group and the control group in mortality (24.4 percent) or any significant difference in average hospital stay per month (3.0 vs. 2.6 days). Sclerotherapy was associated with significantly more epi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed,'first promising results of prophylactic sclerotherapy have been published by Paquet" 12 [6] 13 [13] Primary biliary cirrhosis 6 [5] 3 [2] Cryptogenetic cirrhosis 4 [4] 7 [7] Bleeding free interval (days) Fig. 1 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed,'first promising results of prophylactic sclerotherapy have been published by Paquet" 12 [6] 13 [13] Primary biliary cirrhosis 6 [5] 3 [2] Cryptogenetic cirrhosis 4 [4] 7 [7] Bleeding free interval (days) Fig. 1 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rates of variceal bleeding-related deaths ranged from 0% to 18% (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). In three studies (14,20,21), the bleedingrelated mortality rate was even higher in the treated group than the control (Table 1). It is likely that sclerotherapyinduced ulcers were partly responsible for the higher bleeding rates.…”
Section: Sclerotherapymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Prophylactic endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) has been reported in peer-reviewed RCTs to reduce hemorrhage and mortality in some RCTs , to show no significant improvement in others (12)(13)(14)(15) and to increase the risk of bleeding in another (16). Preliminary communications by other investigators have also noted improved, unchanged or detrimental effects after EST in individual investigations (17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Steven C Wright' Daniel S Matloff' Guadalupe Garcia-tsaomentioning
confidence: 99%