2014
DOI: 10.14309/00000434-201410002-01949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic Tracheal Intubation Versus No Intubation for Upper GI Bleeding: Is There a True Difference in Patient Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results have varied regarding important outcomes such as aspiration, pneumonia, and mortality 31 32 33 34 . Meta-analyses pooling these small observational studies show that prophylactic endotracheal intubation before upper GI endoscopy in all patients with acute UGIH may be associated with a higher risk of aspiration and pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and potentially higher mortality 35 36 37 .…”
Section: Pre-endoscopy Management Of Acute Egvhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results have varied regarding important outcomes such as aspiration, pneumonia, and mortality 31 32 33 34 . Meta-analyses pooling these small observational studies show that prophylactic endotracheal intubation before upper GI endoscopy in all patients with acute UGIH may be associated with a higher risk of aspiration and pneumonia, longer hospital stays, and potentially higher mortality 35 36 37 .…”
Section: Pre-endoscopy Management Of Acute Egvhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in agreement with those of recent meta-analysis in which systematic prophylactic orotracheal intubation to achieve a stable airway for ease of intervention was found to increase the risk of pneumonia and death in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly AVB, compared to endoscopy without intubation. 19,20 Our findings emphasize the importance of limiting orotracheal intubation to highly selected patients, such as those with a low level of consciousness or massive hemorrhage. The routine use of nasogastric aspiration is neither recommended, as so far the available evidence suggests no benefit for patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%