Propolis Trigona sp. Mouthwash Efectiveness in Lowering Anaerobic Gram-Negative Bacteria Colonies

Samad, Rasmidar; Akbar, Fuad Husain; Nursyamsi, Nursyamsi; Awing, Melinda

doi:10.2991/hsic-17.2017.29

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another study showed that periodontal therapy using 10% Brazilian propolis was effective in treating gingivitis and chronic periodontitis (Cairo et al, 2006). A study by Samad et al (2017) proves that mouthwash containing 5%, 7.5%, and 10% propolis was effective in reducing gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Loading and Release Profile Assay of Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Incorporated with Propolis as Bone Graft Material

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontitis can lead to the destruction of the alveolar bone. The loss of the alveolar bone can be treated using carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) as a bone graft material. However, CHA is an alloplastic graft whose primary function is to act as a scaffold, but it is unable to stimulate the process of bone regeneration. Carbonated hydroxyapatite is an avascular synthetic material, which will increase the risk of bacterial adhesion on site that can lead to unsuccessful periodontal therapy. The incorporation of propolis into CHA is expected to add antibacterial capability into CHA. Besides its antibacterial property, propolis also has a bone regenerating effect. Mixing CHA with propolis needs to consider the process of loading the active ingredients into the carrier. The release of propolis is expected to occur gradually over a lengthy period. The purpose of this study was to analyze the loading and releasing assay for propolis incorporated with CHA. A propolis solution of 5%, 7.5%, and 10% was each incorporated into 10 mg of CHA. The loading percentage and releasing assay of propolis were measured. The absorbance reading was done at 289 nm using a UV-vis. It was shown that a 10% propolis solution had the highest loading percentage (32.08%), while the 5% propolis solution had the smallest loading percentage (10.63%). The propolis releasing profiles in all concentration groups were similar. The difference in propolis concentration incorporated with CHA affected the loading percentage but did not affect the propolis releasing assay.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Loading and Release Profile Assay of Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Incorporated with Propolis as Bone Graft Material

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Formulation of Propolis-Based Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (Ras) Protective Patch With Combination of PVP and Cellulose Materials

SAHLAN,

SHOFWATALLOH,

SHOFWATALLOH

et al. 2024

Int J App Pharm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The objective of this study was to obtain a mucoadhesive patch for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) with propolis, proven propolis’ antibacterial ability against bacteria in the oral cavity, and to obtain the physical characteristics of the produced patch. Methods: The patch was produced using a solvent-casting method. The antibacterial properties were determined by the disc diffusion method against S. mutans, S. oralis, S. sanguinis, and S. gingivalis. The physical characteristics of the patch was determined by examining weight and thickness dimension, swelling, surface pH, and structure observation. Results: The patch was made from 8 formulations with different propolis concentrations, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and the use of cellulose materials (Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and Carboxymethylcellulose). The concentrations of propolis used were 3%, 5%, 7%, and 10%. While the ratio of PVP and cellulose material in the formulation is 2:1. Results showed that propolis had a zone of inhibition greater than 2 mm against S. oralis, S. sanguinis, S. mutans, and P. gingivalis bacteria. Patches produced were clear to brown-colored films with high swelling percentage due to hydrophilic polymers used. The patch thickness that is closest to the requirements of the buccal patch was F8 with 0.36+0.04 mm. The mean values of the patches have matched normal salivary pH of 5.5–7. Physically, PVP/CMC formulations were more sticky, and the PVP/HPMC patches were more solid and stronger. Conclusion: A mucoadhesive patch was obtained with a combination of PVP/CMC and PVP/HPMC, tween 80 as a surfactant, glycerin as a plasticizer, peppermint oil as a flavor enhancer and preservative, with the active ingredient propolis.

show abstract

Propolis Trigona sp. Mouthwash Efectiveness in Lowering Anaerobic Gram-Negative Bacteria Colonies

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Loading and Release Profile Assay of Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Incorporated with Propolis as Bone Graft Material

Loading and Release Profile Assay of Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Incorporated with Propolis as Bone Graft Material

Formulation of Propolis-Based Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (Ras) Protective Patch With Combination of PVP and Cellulose Materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About