2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2019.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportionally dense subgraph of maximum size: Complexity and approximation

Abstract: We define a proportionally dense subgraph (PDS) as an induced subgraph of a graph with the property that each vertex in the PDS is adjacent to proportionally as many vertices in the subgraph as in the graph. We prove that the problem of finding a PDS of maximum size is APX-hard on split graphs, and NP-hard on bipartite graphs. We also show that deciding if a PDS is inclusion-wise maximal is co-NP-complete on bipartite graphs. Nevertheless, we present a simple polynomialtime (2− 2 ∆+1 )-approximation algorithm … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, only the vertices inside the PDS must be satisfied. In [4], the authors prove that Max PDS is NP-hard on bipartite and split graphs, and propose a polynomial-time (2− 2 ∆+1 )approximation algorithm, where ∆ is the maximum degree of the graph. They also show that deciding if a subset of vertices can be a (proper) subset of the vertices of a PDS is co-NP-complete on bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, only the vertices inside the PDS must be satisfied. In [4], the authors prove that Max PDS is NP-hard on bipartite and split graphs, and propose a polynomial-time (2− 2 ∆+1 )approximation algorithm, where ∆ is the maximum degree of the graph. They also show that deciding if a subset of vertices can be a (proper) subset of the vertices of a PDS is co-NP-complete on bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%