2023
DOI: 10.3390/polym15112578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal and Numerical Analysis of Organic/Sb2Se3 All-Thin-Film Tandem Solar Cell

Abstract: The low bandgap antimony selenide (Sb2Se3) and wide bandgap organic solar cell (OSC) can be considered suitable bottom and top subcells for use in tandem solar cells. Some properties of these complementary candidates are their non-toxicity and cost-affordability. In this current simulation study, a two-terminal organic/Sb2Se3 thin-film tandem is proposed and designed through TCAD device simulations. To validate the device simulator platform, two solar cells were selected for tandem design, and their experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst14070584/s1, Figure S1: Absorption coefficients deduced from available experimental data for the bottom Si cell: (a) c-Si [54] and (b) a-Si layers [55]; Figure S2: Absorption spectrum of (a) PBDB-TCl:AITC absorber layer [34], (b) UV-vis absorption spectrum of PNDIT-F3N-Br layer [45], (c) Real, and (d) imaginary refractive index Refractive indices deduced from available experimental data for PEDOT:PSS layer [56]; Figure S3: (a) Illuminated J-V curves, and (b) EQE spectra of TSC and its cells, coupled using a tunnel junction; Figure S4: Efficiency over time for various tandem solar cell configurations from 2020 to 2024; Table S1: Definition of physical quantities used in Atlas device simulator; Table S2: Main parameters of various layers of organic solar cell [34,45,57]; Table S3: Defect parameters in OSC; Table S4: Main factors of various layers of thin Si cell [4,38,50,58]; Table S5: A state-of-the-art comparison between tandem cell metrics for a wide range of tandem systems [4,6,7,9,36,42,50,52,53,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst14070584/s1, Figure S1: Absorption coefficients deduced from available experimental data for the bottom Si cell: (a) c-Si [54] and (b) a-Si layers [55]; Figure S2: Absorption spectrum of (a) PBDB-TCl:AITC absorber layer [34], (b) UV-vis absorption spectrum of PNDIT-F3N-Br layer [45], (c) Real, and (d) imaginary refractive index Refractive indices deduced from available experimental data for PEDOT:PSS layer [56]; Figure S3: (a) Illuminated J-V curves, and (b) EQE spectra of TSC and its cells, coupled using a tunnel junction; Figure S4: Efficiency over time for various tandem solar cell configurations from 2020 to 2024; Table S1: Definition of physical quantities used in Atlas device simulator; Table S2: Main parameters of various layers of organic solar cell [34,45,57]; Table S3: Defect parameters in OSC; Table S4: Main factors of various layers of thin Si cell [4,38,50,58]; Table S5: A state-of-the-art comparison between tandem cell metrics for a wide range of tandem systems [4,6,7,9,36,42,50,52,53,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This endeavor underscores the suitability of Sb 2 Se 3 as the bottom sub-cell in tandem configurations, offering an imperative proof of concept. In [29], the authors investigated a tandem device composed of organic/Sb 2 Se 3 . After optimization and current matching, the inverted (p-i-n)/(p-i-n) tandem cell demonstrated a PCE of 21.52%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there exists a notable gap in the exploration of alternative materials, particularly those with potential cost and sustainability advantages. In comparison to Si and perovskite tandems, Sb 2 Se 3 -based tandems hold the promise of lower production costs and improved environmental sustainability, owing to the abundance and eco-friendliness of the constituent materials [29,37]. Additionally, compatibility with flexible substrates, position it as a competitive candidate for tandem configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through optimization and current matching, the inverted tandem cell achieved an impressive power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 21.52%, while the conventional tandem cell achieved a PCE of 19.14%. The initial standalone top and bottom cells exhibited efficiencies of 9.45% and 7.89% respectively 29 . The crystal structures and characteristics of Sb 2 S 3 and Sb 2 Se 3 are, however, similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%