2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal and Validation of a New Functional Ambulation Classification Scale for Clinical Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
74
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean ambulation scale was 2.4 preoperatively and 4.4 postoperatively for Group I and 2.5 preoperatively and 4.1 postoperatively for Group II [17]. Ten of 17 patients in Group I had decreased needs for ambulatory aids, whereas seven of 17 continued with the same status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean ambulation scale was 2.4 preoperatively and 4.4 postoperatively for Group I and 2.5 preoperatively and 4.1 postoperatively for Group II [17]. Ten of 17 patients in Group I had decreased needs for ambulatory aids, whereas seven of 17 continued with the same status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Data parameters collected from the patients' preoperative medical records included age, gender, ethnicity, mechanism of injury resulting in TBI, mean time since injury, hemiplegic side, detailed physical and neurologic examination findings, assessment of ankle-foot deformity, preoperative orthotic and ambulatory aid needs, and ambulatory scale scores [17] (Table 1). In addition, preoperative gait analysis and dynamic EMG results were reviewed, which were part of the normal preoperative workup for patients undergoing correction for SEV ( Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients are able to walk in all types of irregular surfaces, including steps, stairs, ramps and curbs. 12 Therefore, the mobility is not a great problem, allowing the individuals to participate in rehabilitation programs and others physical activities. However, the patients in this condition are exposed to environmental hazards, which can compromises the balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information collected included demographic data, duration of disease, HTLV-I proviral load in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, practice of exercise, the use of walking aids, the number of falls and the occurrence of injuries related to falls in the last year. The Functional Ambulation Classification Scale (FACS) 12 was also applied. This scale is used to determine the different levels of walking ability (0 ¼ non ambulation; 1 ¼ non functional ambulation; 2 ¼ household ambulation; 3 ¼ neighborhood ambulation; 4 ¼ independent community ambulation; 5 ¼ normal ambulation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinical questionnaire was used to collect the characteristics data from individuals, such as socio-demographic information, TSP/HAM specific measures (disease duration, HTLV-I proviral load), number of falls in the last year, use of devices to walk and walking ability 17 . Disease-specific scales such as the Expanded Disability Status Scale 18 and the Insituto de Pesquisa Clinica Evandro Chagas disability scale 19 were also applied to evaluate severity in TSP/HAM.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%