Proposal, design, and evaluation of a values-based online survey

Philpot, Simone; Philpot, C.T.; Hipel, Keith W.; Johnson, Peter A.

doi:10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100015

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Partisipasi masyarakat bisa bermacam-macam bentuknya. Analisis keputusan memberikan serangkaian proses musyawarah dan penataan keputusan yang berguna dalam memperoleh preferensi dan perspektif masyarakat (Philpot, Philpot, Hipel, & Johnson, 2022). Selama periode yang panjang, partisipasi masyarakat umumnya terjadi pada tahap akhir siklus kebijakan, yang mana beberapa alternatif terhadap suatu masalah telah diidentifikasi.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Bandung Sadayana: Partisipasi Digital Masyarakat Kota Bandung dalam Membangun Smart City

Haryani,

Putri,

Jannah

2024

VJVI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The digital era has changed interactions between government and society, especially through wider digital participation and easy access through digital media. Community participation in this context can take the form of decision analysis, involving a process of deliberation and decision structuring to understand community preferences and perspectives. However, this participation is often limited to the later stages of the policy cycle, reducing the public's contribution to policy formation. This research focuses on the digital participation of the people of Bandung City, which is increasingly active through initiatives such as Bandung Sadayana. This platform, through features like Badami Forum, enables citizens to contribute to the development of the city. In the context of smart city development, Bandung faces challenges such as uneven socialization, lack of understanding of the smart city roadmap, and limited infrastructure. The effectiveness of community participation is influenced by a number of factors, including active involvement in planning forums, information transparency, effective communication, and the quality of policy implementation. Recommendations involve expanding digital participation through outreach campaigns, increasing transparency and communication, and focusing on the quality of project implementation.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Bandung Sadayana: Partisipasi Digital Masyarakat Kota Bandung dalam Membangun Smart City

Haryani,

Putri,

Jannah

2024

VJVI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…How to best engage citizens in complex public decision-making is still unclear, but relying on information and communication technology appears to offer substantial promise [4,5]. For instance, e-negotiation platforms [6,7] and specifically designed online surveys [8][9][10] have been developed and tested. Our research contributes to this endeavor: We developed a novel online survey to collect citizens' preferences in complex structured decision-making supported by multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA).…”

Section: General Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gamified online surveys: Assessing experience with self-determination theory

Aubert,

Scheidegger,

Schmid

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We developed four online interfaces supporting citizen participation in decision-making. We included (1) learning loops (LLs), good practice in decision analysis, and (2) gamification, to enliven an otherwise long and tedious survey. We investigated the effects of these features on drop-out rate, perceived experience, and basic psychological needs (BPNs): autonomy, competence, and relatedness, all from self-determination theory. We also investigated how BPNs and individual causality orientation influence experience of the four interfaces. Answers from 785 respondents, representative of the Swiss German-speaking population in age and gender, provided insightful results. LLs and gamification increased drop-out rate. Experience was better explained by the BPN satisfaction than by the interface, and this was moderated by respondents’ causality orientations. LLs increased the challenge, and gamification enhanced the social experience and playfulness. LLs frustrated all three needs, and gamification satisfied relatedness. Autonomy and relatedness both positively influenced the social experience, but competence was negatively correlated with challenge. All observed effects were small. Hence, using gamification for decision-making is questionable, and understanding individual variability is a prerequisite; this study has helped disentangle the diversity of responses to survey design options.

show abstract