2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.8744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal for a hardness measurement technique without indentor by gas-cluster-beam bombardment

Abstract: Large gas-cluster-ion bombardment has been shown to be a unique tool for generating a variety of bombarding effects over a broad range of acceleration energies. A hardness measurement technique is proposed in this paper based on the use of the effect of crater formation by large gas-cluster beams. The cluster impact leaves a hemispherical crater on a surface, the size of which varies with surface hardness and cluster parameters ͑which can be predetermined͒. As shown in this paper, the crater depth h ͑or diamet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.167601 PACS numbers: 79.20.Rf, 61.80.Jh, 61.82.Pv, 81.16.Rf Energetic atomic [1-3], molecular or cluster ions [4] impacting solids may leave tiny holes at the surface often surrounded by a raised region of displaced material. The observed surface morphology [1][2][3][4] is similar to what is found in ablation craters produced by an intense laser pulse [5,6], in macroscopic craters produced by meteorite impacts on planets [7], or by balls dropped into granular media [8], although their spatial scales may differ by about 17 orders of magnitude. Depending on the energy regime of the ions and the type of material being bombarded, the shape of the impact features and the underlying mechanisms of formation may differ [9,10].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.167601 PACS numbers: 79.20.Rf, 61.80.Jh, 61.82.Pv, 81.16.Rf Energetic atomic [1-3], molecular or cluster ions [4] impacting solids may leave tiny holes at the surface often surrounded by a raised region of displaced material. The observed surface morphology [1][2][3][4] is similar to what is found in ablation craters produced by an intense laser pulse [5,6], in macroscopic craters produced by meteorite impacts on planets [7], or by balls dropped into granular media [8], although their spatial scales may differ by about 17 orders of magnitude. Depending on the energy regime of the ions and the type of material being bombarded, the shape of the impact features and the underlying mechanisms of formation may differ [9,10].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Energetic atomic [1][2][3], molecular or cluster ions [4] impacting solids may leave tiny holes at the surface often surrounded by a raised region of displaced material. The observed surface morphology [1][2][3][4] is similar to what is found in ablation craters produced by an intense laser pulse [5,6], in macroscopic craters produced by meteorite impacts on planets [7], or by balls dropped into granular media [8], although their spatial scales may differ by about 17 orders of magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 A new hybrid model utilizing MD for the atoms in the central collision zone, and continuum mechanics and thermodynamics outside, has been proposed in a previous paper 16 and used for crater formation study in Ref. 17. In this model, a shock wave theory is used to establish the minimum size of the central zone, i.e., the location of the boundary between the volume where MD models atomic collisions and the outside, which is treated as continuum.…”
Section: A Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, surface roughness did not increase rapidly and seemed to saturate under large cluster bombardment. This result could be attributed to the difference in crater shape formed with each cluster ion bombardment [19] . Crater-like damage is formed on solid surface with energetic cluster ion bombardment because a large number of surface atoms are displaced and sputtered spherically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%