1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61200-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of an Evaluating Method on Lubrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCT was developed to realize a nearly homogeneously distributed contact normal stress and surface enlargement [17]. This differentiates the SCT from other tribometers such as the Double Cup Extrusion Test [18], the Ring Compression Test [19] or the Spike Test [20]. Results derived from the SCT are in good quantitative agreement with results gained with other tribometers [21].…”
Section: Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The SCT was developed to realize a nearly homogeneously distributed contact normal stress and surface enlargement [17]. This differentiates the SCT from other tribometers such as the Double Cup Extrusion Test [18], the Ring Compression Test [19] or the Spike Test [20]. Results derived from the SCT are in good quantitative agreement with results gained with other tribometers [21].…”
Section: Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…From Table 3, it can be found that H 0 high (m = 0.3) is larger than H 0 low (m = 0.1) in some schemes including schemes 9-14 and 16, and it means that the spike height increases with the friction factor which is different from conventional discussions. 11,22 Therefore, further discussions need to be carried out. So, all results are classified into three groups according to the level of spike height difference, that is, schemes 13, 14 in group A, schemes 11, 12 in group B, and schemes 9, 10, and 16 in group C, respectively.…”
Section: Fe-based Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It utilizes a hydraulic press to apply the necessary contact normal stresses up to 3,000N/mm², surface enlargements up to 11 and relative velocities up to 500 mm/s which may occur during cold forging. In comparison to other tribometers like the Double-Cup-Extrusion Test [14], the Ring Compression Test [15] or the Spike Test [16], it is possible to set a specific and nearly homogeneously distributed contact normal stress and surface enlargement. These are important parameters for a reliable determination of the friction coefficient.…”
Section: Sliding Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%