Proposal of phylogenetic revision of the subgenus “Morphocarabus” on the basis of molecular biology criteria

Dreano, Stéphane; Barloy, Jean; Prunar, Florin; Frédérique, Barloy Hubler; Prunar, Silvia

doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.06.133

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the authors [9][10][11][12][13][14] classify comptus as a subspecies of rothi [15] rank the species in the schleideri group [16] considered comptus as a separate species. The molecular biology analysis with the marker 28Sr RNA 5 [17] places comptus within the rothi group toghether with hampei, kollari, alutensis (figure 2). The membership of comptus as a subspecies of rothi seems well established.…”

Section: Results and Discussion Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Carabus (MORPHOCARABUS) ROTHI COMPTUS Dejean 1831

Barloy

Dreano

Barloy-Hubler

et al. 2019

Advanced Research in Life Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C. (Morphocarabus) rothi comptus Dejean 1831, is a endemic species of the Romania, appearing localized to some mountainous massifs of Romanian Banat and their piedmont areas (Poiana Rusca Mountains, Țarcu Mountains). Its presence in the Apuseni Mountains is doubtful, due to the lack of recent captures and to the confusion with C. (Morphocarabus) hampei diffinis Csiki 1905, morphologically like. In Banat the species occurs in two forms: szorenyensis Csiki 1908 at higher altitude (1300-2000 m) and ulrichhoffmanni Lie 1982 in hilly areas, which is distinguished by a larger size. Whatever the altitude and the ecological conditions, the period of activity is brief, spread over a month with a maximum of over two weeks. Molecular biology studies: confirm the belonging of comptus to rothi as a subspecies of her (28SRNA5 marker); suggest (concatenation COI I / cyt b) a low infra-specific variability between provenances of the szorenyensis (Rusca, Muntele Mic) and between the origins of the ulrichhoffmanni.

show abstract

Section: Results and Discussion Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%