2024
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of three novel insect-associated Commensalibacter species: Commensalibacter melissae sp. nov., Commensalibacter communis sp. nov. and Commensalibacter papalotli sp. nov.

Juliana Botero,
Peter Vandamme

Abstract: A recent modification of the Note to Rule 25a of the International Code for Nomenclature of Bacteria is used a posteriori by the List Editors of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology to justify the refusal to validate species protologues published in supplementary material prior to this formal decision. Authors are therefore forced to ask permission to reuse published data for the valid publication of such names. In the present letter we re-publish the species protologues of Com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strains TBRC 10068 T and TBRC 16381 T shared a similarity of 98.56 and 97.70 % respectively to C. intestini A911 T (). Furthermore, the two strains were very similar to C. communis LMG 31819 T , with values of 98.99 and 98.28 %, respectively, followed by C. papalotli LMG 32512 T (98.21 and 97.70 %) and C. melissae LMG 31900 T (96.55 and 97.49 %) [8], when compared with the recently published and validated species after submitting this paper [9]. According to Kim et al [28], the 16S rRNA gene similarity values for strains TBRC 10068 T and TBRC 16381 T were nearly below the proposed threshold for the delineation of bacterial species (98.65 %), with only the exception of strain TBRC 10068 T and C. communis LMG 31819 T .…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains TBRC 10068 T and TBRC 16381 T shared a similarity of 98.56 and 97.70 % respectively to C. intestini A911 T (). Furthermore, the two strains were very similar to C. communis LMG 31819 T , with values of 98.99 and 98.28 %, respectively, followed by C. papalotli LMG 32512 T (98.21 and 97.70 %) and C. melissae LMG 31900 T (96.55 and 97.49 %) [8], when compared with the recently published and validated species after submitting this paper [9]. According to Kim et al [28], the 16S rRNA gene similarity values for strains TBRC 10068 T and TBRC 16381 T were nearly below the proposed threshold for the delineation of bacterial species (98.65 %), with only the exception of strain TBRC 10068 T and C. communis LMG 31819 T .…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our first comparison, we included Lactobacillus apis, L. bombicola, L. helsingborgensis, L. kimbladii, L. kullabergensis, L. melliventris, L. panisapium, L. acetotolerans, and L. acetotolerans from the obligately necrophagous bee's gut. For the second, we were interested in bee-associated Commensalibacter and included C. communis, C. intestini, C. melissae, and one C. intestini from our obligately necrophagous bees' guts and another from one of our facultative necrophages (Trigona fulviventris) (Botero et al, 2023;Botero & Vandamme, 2024;Li, Praet, et al, 2015). For both analyses, we used Orthofinder with the flags "-M msa -S blast" to pull single-copy orthologues and create species trees (Emms & Kelly, 2019).…”
Section: Selection Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%