2020
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal to reclassify Lactobacillus zhaodongensis, Lactobacillus zeae, Lactobacillus argentoratensis and Lactobacillus buchneri subsp. silagei as Lacticaseibacillus zhaodongensis comb. nov., Lacticaseibacillus zeae comb. nov., Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis comb. nov. and Lentilactobacillus buchneri subsp. silagei comb. nov., respectively and Apilactobacillus kosoi as a later heterotypic synonym of Apilactobacillus micheneri

Abstract: Recently, the members of the genus Lactobacillus have been reclassified by Zheng et al. At the same time, Lactobacillus buchneri subsp. silagei , Lactobacillus zhaodongensis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L. rhamnosus is a member of the probiotic Lactobacillus genus, which is a short, rod-shape, Gram-positive, homofermentative, facultative anaerobic. Originally, it was considered to be a subspecies of L. casei , but genetic research found it to be a separate species in the L. casei clade, which also includes L. paracasei and L. zeae [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Several changes have been made to the taxonomy of the L. casei group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. rhamnosus is a member of the probiotic Lactobacillus genus, which is a short, rod-shape, Gram-positive, homofermentative, facultative anaerobic. Originally, it was considered to be a subspecies of L. casei , but genetic research found it to be a separate species in the L. casei clade, which also includes L. paracasei and L. zeae [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Several changes have been made to the taxonomy of the L. casei group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve isolates were identified as Lacticaseibacillus zeae by MALDI-TOF MS, but with score values of 1.700–1.999, indicating low reliability of results at the species level. Considering that L. rhamnosus species was not found among the best matches, it is likely that these isolates actually belong to L. zeae species but were mislabelled – which is not unusual considering that these two species are closely related and that the current type strain ATCC 15820/DSM 20178 of L. zeae ( Liu and Gu, 2020 ) has been reclassified a few times. However, PCR with primers PrI and RhaII, which are specific for L. rhamnosus and do not amplify the DNA of L. zeae ( Walter et al, 2000 ), yielded positive results for these 12 isolates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, the type strain of L. casei was confirmed as the original strain ATCC 393, and strain ATCC 334 was designated as L. paracasei . The species name L. zeae was reclassified as L. casei in 2008 ( Tindall and Syste, 2008 ) and reassigned to distinct species status in 2020 ( Liu and Gu, 2020 ). Therefore, the confusion around the species L. zeae , which is found in the Biotyper database but absent from the labels, is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A list of 281 taxa and associated genome sequences was derived from Zheng et al (2020), and supplemented with five more recently defined Lactobacillus spp. (Bai et al, 2020;Liu & Gu, 2020) for a final list of 286 validly published species and subspecies. In cases where the species was already represented in cpnDB (http://www.cpndb.ca), the genus name was updated to reflect the new name.…”
Section: Retrieval Of Sequence Data and Update Of Cpndbmentioning
confidence: 99%