Shareholder Protection Reconsidered 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429293344-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposals for a functioning and truly protective derivative action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those are merely an 'entrusted litigation group' and oppression remedies serve this purpose anyway. 134 Thus, contrary to the approach taken by the UK CA 2006, we submit that there is no need for the Cypriot statute to include claimant-focused factors within the set of conditions for permission to be given. For instance, good faith 135 of the derivative claimant does not necessarily mean that bringing the claim is in the company's best interests, whilst it is not inconceivable that a claim brought in bad faith (that is to say, a claim brought to serve ulterior motives) might actually benefit the company, if successful.…”
Section: τHe Prospect Of a Statutory Reformmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Those are merely an 'entrusted litigation group' and oppression remedies serve this purpose anyway. 134 Thus, contrary to the approach taken by the UK CA 2006, we submit that there is no need for the Cypriot statute to include claimant-focused factors within the set of conditions for permission to be given. For instance, good faith 135 of the derivative claimant does not necessarily mean that bringing the claim is in the company's best interests, whilst it is not inconceivable that a claim brought in bad faith (that is to say, a claim brought to serve ulterior motives) might actually benefit the company, if successful.…”
Section: τHe Prospect Of a Statutory Reformmentioning
confidence: 86%