2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.056309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed method to estimate the liquid-vapor accommodation coefficient based on experimental sonoluminescence data

Abstract: We used the temporal evolution of the bubble radius in single-bubble sonoluminescence to estimate the water liquid-vapor accommodation coefficient. The rapid changes in the bubble radius that occur during the bubble collapse and rebounds are a function of the actual value of the accommodation coefficient. We selected bubble radius measurements obtained from two different experimental techniques in conjunction with a robust parameter estimation strategy and we obtained that for water at room temperature the mas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, mass transfer between the interior and exterior of the bubble is neglected. Including either or both is possible (Church 1989; Matsumoto et al 2005; Kreider et al 2011), but with the exception of the cases for water and urine at longer pulse durations, the effects would be small because in tissue, lipids and proteins predominate in the surroundings, greatly reducing the accommodation coefficient from the value in pure water (Puente and Bonetto 2005; Fuster et al 2010). Fourth, assuming that the bubble radius is small compared to the wavelength is implemented by assuming that the acoustic pressure on the bubble wall is uniform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, mass transfer between the interior and exterior of the bubble is neglected. Including either or both is possible (Church 1989; Matsumoto et al 2005; Kreider et al 2011), but with the exception of the cases for water and urine at longer pulse durations, the effects would be small because in tissue, lipids and proteins predominate in the surroundings, greatly reducing the accommodation coefficient from the value in pure water (Puente and Bonetto 2005; Fuster et al 2010). Fourth, assuming that the bubble radius is small compared to the wavelength is implemented by assuming that the acoustic pressure on the bubble wall is uniform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the interface [r ¼ R(t)], mass transfer is neglected, limiting the strict model applicability to forcing pressure wave frequencies above 100 kHz, where RP models have shown that the bubble dynamics is unaffected by evaporation/condensation. [26][27][28][29] Viscous stresses and radiation heat transfer are also neglected. Continuity, momentum, and energy transport equations applied to an infinitesimal shell about the interface yield the following relations, coupling bubble and liquid variables,…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several values have been reported for the accommodation coefficient, ranging from 10 −3 to 1 for various systems. 9,20 Toegel et al suggested that vapor transport is controlled by the rate of diffusion inside the cavity. 11 Assuming that the total molar concentration inside the cavity, C t , is spatially uniform, the following expression is obtained from the Maxwell-Stefan theory, which holds for diluted as well as concentrated systems:…”
Section: ͑8͒mentioning
confidence: 99%