2019
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1599060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed non-linear relation between satisfaction with government performance and co-production: an initial empirical test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Song et al (2021) noted that granting individual schools autonomy in human resource decisions can amplify the positive feedback from students' academic performance. (Beeri et al, 2019;Kampen et al, 2006;Porumbescu, 2017b;Van Ryzin, 2004;Zhao & Hu, 2017) Trust in state/federal government 5 (12.5%) Trust in state government (Morgeson & Petrescu, 2011;Vigoda-Gadot, 2007;Welch et al, 2004) Trust in federal government (Welch et al, 2004;Zhao & Hu, 2017) Participation (16, 40.0%) Participation 6 (15.0%) Participation (Oh et al, 2022;Vigoda-Gadot, 2007;Wong et al, 2011) Co-production (Mok, 2020 Similarly, albeit their insignificant or negative impacts at times, many studies have documented the significance of an organizational capacity in reinforcing the connections between the antecedents of interests and citizen satisfaction, such as a bureaucratic personnel quality (Dahlström et al, 2018), locality's communication effectiveness (Ho & Cho, 2017), autonomy (Song et al, 2021), school performance (Song & Meier, 2018), and municipality's transparency (Park & Blenkinsopp, 2011). Hence, organizational conditions emerge as influential moderators in the relationship between antecedents and citizen satisfaction.…”
Section: Moderators Between Antecedents and Citizen Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al (2021) noted that granting individual schools autonomy in human resource decisions can amplify the positive feedback from students' academic performance. (Beeri et al, 2019;Kampen et al, 2006;Porumbescu, 2017b;Van Ryzin, 2004;Zhao & Hu, 2017) Trust in state/federal government 5 (12.5%) Trust in state government (Morgeson & Petrescu, 2011;Vigoda-Gadot, 2007;Welch et al, 2004) Trust in federal government (Welch et al, 2004;Zhao & Hu, 2017) Participation (16, 40.0%) Participation 6 (15.0%) Participation (Oh et al, 2022;Vigoda-Gadot, 2007;Wong et al, 2011) Co-production (Mok, 2020 Similarly, albeit their insignificant or negative impacts at times, many studies have documented the significance of an organizational capacity in reinforcing the connections between the antecedents of interests and citizen satisfaction, such as a bureaucratic personnel quality (Dahlström et al, 2018), locality's communication effectiveness (Ho & Cho, 2017), autonomy (Song et al, 2021), school performance (Song & Meier, 2018), and municipality's transparency (Park & Blenkinsopp, 2011). Hence, organizational conditions emerge as influential moderators in the relationship between antecedents and citizen satisfaction.…”
Section: Moderators Between Antecedents and Citizen Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few conditions must be met so that the governance of PA can really make a positive impact. First, communities of PA `tend to be satisfied with PAs when their perceived performance exceeds their expectations and dissatisfied when their perceived performance falls short of expectations' [27]. Second, `a person would be more likely to support a PA if he or she believes that his or her family or leaders would also support it, although such a perception may not reflect what others actually think' [28].…”
Section: Excludedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of PAs, the performance of an area in terms of services and benefits provided to the residents does not translate to satisfaction if the initial expectations of that performance surpass the actual performance [16]. In other words, individuals tend to be satisfied with PAs when their perceived performance exceeds their expectations and dissatisfied when their perceived performance falls short of expectations [18]. The perceived negative and positive outcomes of a consumer experience are called negative and positive disconfirmation, respectively [17].…”
Section: Expectancy Disconfirmation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%