2019
DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed objective scoring algorithm for assessment and intervention recovery following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis based on relevant gait metrics from wearable devices: the Gait Posture index (GPi)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These health metrics may also be quantitatively combined, potentially enhancing accuracy and allowing for more objective inter-and intrapatient comparisons. The Gait Posture index (GPi) is one such promising tool which demonstrates this concept by synthesising a number of physical activity metrics, ideally collected via a wearable device, into a simple index (78,79). Wearable devices may also improve the implementation of prophylactic measures ( 62) such as tracking the body positions of patients and providing alarms after a predetermined period of inactivity to ensure that patients are rolled to prevent pressure sores.…”
Section: The Potential Impact Of Wearable Devices In Postoperative Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These health metrics may also be quantitatively combined, potentially enhancing accuracy and allowing for more objective inter-and intrapatient comparisons. The Gait Posture index (GPi) is one such promising tool which demonstrates this concept by synthesising a number of physical activity metrics, ideally collected via a wearable device, into a simple index (78,79). Wearable devices may also improve the implementation of prophylactic measures ( 62) such as tracking the body positions of patients and providing alarms after a predetermined period of inactivity to ensure that patients are rolled to prevent pressure sores.…”
Section: The Potential Impact Of Wearable Devices In Postoperative Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much of the research identified in this review is focussed on physical activity, the feasibility of collecting other types of data, such as vital signs, and their usefulness should be explored. These data types may ultimately be synthesised into an index capable of quantitatively representing overall patient function, thereby making greater use of currently available health data and extending existing tools, such as the GPi (78,79), to more accurately assess and monitor patient recovery.…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another new technology and innovation that was not considered in 2006 was the application of wearable technology sensors (37). Recent work has evaluated the use of "wearables" for objective measurements for outcomes analysis (38). Most clinical studies employ subjective observations to evaluate clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides posture, the use of wearable devices for gait analysis in LSS patients has received significant attention as evidence suggests these patients demonstrate detectable gait metrics differences compared to normal subjects [34]. The use of a commercial wearable device for detecting gait metrics in LSS is promising with a proposed objective scoring algorithm—the gait posture index (GPi), potentially providing an objective measure of patient function post-surgical interventions [35]. Furthermore, wearable devices can play a vital role in rehabilitation programs, as posture awareness is an essential component.…”
Section: Clinical Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%