2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed standards for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries

Abstract: A standard procedure for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries has been produced. It is applicable to presenting results of treatment by surgery, endoscopy, and interventional radiology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cholangitis was defined according to Tokyo Guidelines 2018 [13]. Long-term outcomes were defined using the recently proposed standard outcomes of treating BDI [7]. Grading of BDI was defined as Severity Grade 1 (SG1): .…”
Section: Outcomes Of Bdimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cholangitis was defined according to Tokyo Guidelines 2018 [13]. Long-term outcomes were defined using the recently proposed standard outcomes of treating BDI [7]. Grading of BDI was defined as Severity Grade 1 (SG1): .…”
Section: Outcomes Of Bdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perioperative mortality was considered as no primary patency attained. Metrics measured in the study were percent of patients attaining primary patency, loss of primary patency, and actuarial primary patency rate at 3, 5, and 10 years [7].…”
Section: Outcomes Of Bdimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were two patients referred from the private sector who requested no further surgical intervention and opted for PTConly management of biliary anastomotic strictures after initial surgical repair, preventing them from achieving secondary patency. 14 There are limitations for this research that should be acknowledged. This study was retrospective in design and is subject to biases inherent to observational retrospective studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following treatment, patients were also graded according to the standards proposed by Cho et al in 2017. 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%