2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed strategies for optical observations in a future European Space Surveillance network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Telescopes with similar technical features may provide very different performances. We have based our simulations on the following previous work: Olmedo et al (2008), for the definition of the GEO survey, and the GEO and MEO tracking strategies for GB telescopes; Sánchez‐Ortiz et al (2008b), for the definition of observation strategies for SB telescopes; Flohrer, Schildknecht & Musci (2007), for GB telescopes for MEO surveying.…”
Section: Observation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telescopes with similar technical features may provide very different performances. We have based our simulations on the following previous work: Olmedo et al (2008), for the definition of the GEO survey, and the GEO and MEO tracking strategies for GB telescopes; Sánchez‐Ortiz et al (2008b), for the definition of observation strategies for SB telescopes; Flohrer, Schildknecht & Musci (2007), for GB telescopes for MEO surveying.…”
Section: Observation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space-based sensors have been introduced to support ground-based space surveillance networks [10][11][12], and they turned to be fundamental assets for current and future SSA programs [13,14]. Space-based observations can guarantee better accuracies, versatile field of views and, most importantly, independence from day/night cycles and atmospheric weather conditions, when compared to ground-based optical observations [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, uncontrolled objects from the previous space missions are currently occupying important orbital slots, causing notable collision possibilities with operative and non-operative satellites [1]. Despite the recent adoption of some mitigation guidelines [3] and the development of a network of space debris surveillance and awareness [4] [5], the threat of such incidents cannot be totally averted. Collisions, as the one between Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 in 2009 [6], are still probable, and they can trigger cascade phenomena that may compromise future utilization of space, labelled as Kessler 1 Associate Professor, University of Alicante, POBox 99, 03080, Alicante, Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%