2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and the risk for neurocognitive adverse events: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, PCSK9i has been reported in many meta-analysis as associated with neurocognitive disorder ( Harvey et al, 2018 ; Gouverneur et al, 2021 ). However, Khan and Raccah et al performed that evidence of neurocognitive adverse events was found during follow-up periods ( Hirsh Raccah et al, 2021 ; Khan et al, 2017 ). In our network meta-analysis, we were unable to analyze the adverse neurological events due to the few studies that reported relevant events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, PCSK9i has been reported in many meta-analysis as associated with neurocognitive disorder ( Harvey et al, 2018 ; Gouverneur et al, 2021 ). However, Khan and Raccah et al performed that evidence of neurocognitive adverse events was found during follow-up periods ( Hirsh Raccah et al, 2021 ; Khan et al, 2017 ). In our network meta-analysis, we were unable to analyze the adverse neurological events due to the few studies that reported relevant events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 64 A meta-analysis of 59,733 patients pooling data from RCTs on the impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on neurocognitive adverse events found no significant increase in risk of neurocognitive adverse effects with PCSK9 inhibitors. 65 Meanwhile, among older adults, subgroup analysis from both the FOURIER and ODDYSSEY-OUTCOMES trials found no significant interaction for efficacy and no additional increase in safety outcomes when stratified by age. 66–68 …”
Section: Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…64 A meta-analysis of 59,733 patients pooling data from RCTs on the impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on neurocognitive adverse events found no significant increase in risk of neurocognitive adverse effects with PCSK9 inhibitors. 65 Meanwhile, among older adults, subgroup analysis from both the FOURIER and ODDYSSEY-OUTCOMES trials found no significant interaction for efficacy and no additional increase in safety outcomes when stratified by age. [66][67][68] A Mendelian randomization study of PCSK9 variants showed an increased risk for diabetes (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.19) in the setting of impaired fasting glucose, which was comparable with variants for HMGCR.…”
Section: Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subsequent meta-analyses found no increased risk of NCEs in the groups treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. 10,11…”
Section: Pcsk9 Inhibitors and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent metaanalyses found no increased risk of NCEs in the groups treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. 10,11 Furthermore, the Evaluating PCSK9 Binding Antibody Influence on Cognitive Health in High Cardiovascular Risk Subjects (EBBINGHAUS) trial assessed cognitive function across a wide range of domains, including memory and attention, prospectively. Executive function and episodic memory were assessed and were similar in the evolocumab group compared to the placebo group in the subgroups of patients stratified according to their lowest-attained LDL-C levels.…”
Section: Pcsk9 Inhibitors and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%