Buckling of slender structures is traditionally regarded as a first route toward failure. Here, we provide an alternative perspective on a burgeoning movement where mechanical instabilities are exploited to devise new classes of functional mechanisms that make use of the geometrically nonlinear behavior of their postbuckling regimes. Selected examples are highlighted across length-scales to illustrate some of the exciting opportunities that lie ahead. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4031456]
IntroductionSlender structural elements (e.g., rods, plates and shells) under compression are ubiquitously subjected to mechanical instabilities. In 1744, Euler [1] laid the foundation for the formal analysis of structural stability; a field that has matured to become paramount in engineering design and one of the pillars in the history of mechanics [2]. A modern and detailed perspective on the stability of structures is found in the seminal book by Ba zant and Cedolin [3]. Across length-scales, buckling has traditionally been regarded as a first route toward failure and can lead to catastrophic collapse [4]; an approach that can be succinctly referred to as Buckliphobia. By contrast, Buckliphilia is a more recent and burgeoning trend that is changing the above paradigm. Mechanical instabilities of slender structures are therefore envisioned as opportunities for novel modes of functionality that are to be predictively understood in order to then be exploited.In these efforts of adopting Buckliphilia, there is a need to rationalize the complex configurations that arise in the postbuckling regime, far-from-threshold. The large displacements and rotations permissible by slender structures can yield nontrivial and nonnegligible geometric nonlinearities, even if their material properties remain linear. Furthermore, this strong rooting of the postbuckling behavior on geometry results in general and universal modes of deformation; albeit with threshold or onsets that are scale-or material-dependent. To avoid overstatement, it is important to note that viscoelasticity, plasticity, fracture, and other phenomena can introduce additional time-and length-scales that may compromise the geometric universality of the buckling modes. In many problems involving the large deformation of thin structures, however, the strains at the material level are small enough, such that these effects are secondary and a linear elastic constitutive description suffices.Qualifying a structure as slender is a statement on aspect ratio rather than length-scale, which added to the fact that elasticity is a scale-free theory, ensures that functional mechanisms based on the instability of slender structures can be instantiated over a wide range of length-scales. In Fig. 1, we represent three representative examples that illustrate this scale invariance. First, the crumpling of paper [5] (Fig. 1(a)) has been regarded by the nonlinear physics community as a canonical problem, at the centimeter scale, for Precision desktop experiment to study the buckling of a thin rod injected int...