2007
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.2.34302r2857511268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propylthiouracil (PROP) - A Tool to Determine Taster Status in Relation to Caries Experience, Streptococcus Mutans Levels and Dietary Preferences in Children

Abstract: Purpose: Dental caries remains the single most common disease of childhood that is neither self-limiting nor amenable to short term pharmacological management. Hence, there is a need to identify and institute preventive measures for those children who are at a greater risk for developing dental caries to determine the prevalence of tasters and non tasters among the group of school aged children. To compare and contrast the prevalence of dental caries, S.mutans levels and dietary preferences in children with di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Lin’s study, 25 the majority of children in the study group were medium tasters (58%), followed by supertasters (31%), and non‐tasters (11%). Other studies 27,28 also show similar results. This difference in the prevalence rates of the present study from previous studies may be attributed to the fact that exact comparisons with previous studies are not feasible due to: (a) different geographic distributions; (b) different methods of PROP disk preparation; (c) different concentrations of PROP disk used; (d) age span and sex discrepancies of the participants; (d) the present study utilizing NaCl standards to help clarify borderline responses, and thus, improve the group allotment; and (e) different cut‐off scores for grouping taste statuses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In Lin’s study, 25 the majority of children in the study group were medium tasters (58%), followed by supertasters (31%), and non‐tasters (11%). Other studies 27,28 also show similar results. This difference in the prevalence rates of the present study from previous studies may be attributed to the fact that exact comparisons with previous studies are not feasible due to: (a) different geographic distributions; (b) different methods of PROP disk preparation; (c) different concentrations of PROP disk used; (d) age span and sex discrepancies of the participants; (d) the present study utilizing NaCl standards to help clarify borderline responses, and thus, improve the group allotment; and (e) different cut‐off scores for grouping taste statuses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[10] A child's preferences for sugar may lead to increase in dental caries and a compromised state of health. [21113]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2007). Additionally, children nontasters were sweet likers while supertasters were sweet dislikers, and their PROP sensitivity was linked to dental caries (Rupesh and Nayak 2006; Verma et al. 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%