Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject

Prianto, Yuwono; Sumantri, Viony Kresna; Sasmita, Paksi Yudha

doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200515.067

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The rights and duties are interpreted as the corporation's rights and obligations. [20], [21]. However, it is possible for AI to receive knowledge and simulate thinking or reasoning like humans.…”

Section: Legal Basis and Challenges Of Ai Application In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Legal: Proposing Artificial Intelligence Application to Provide Free Legal Aid in Indonesia

Hakim,

Praja,

Setyaningrum

et al. 2024

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the provision of free legal aid in Indonesia. The imperative for accessible, dependable, and professional legal aid is recognized as a fundamental right for all individuals, as stipulated by the Indonesian Constitution. Additionally, the state has promulgated legal aid regulations in the form of rules and implementing guidelines, emphasizing the obligation for law enforcers, particularly advocates, to offer free legal assistance to individuals with lower incomes. Employing a literature review methodology, this study draws insights from legal texts, books, journals, and other pertinent sources to analyze the subject comprehensively. The data is qualitatively analyzed and presented descriptively. The findings demonstrate the significant potential of AI to become an integral component in providing sustained and effective free legal aid, particularly in handling large caseloads and enhancing the ability of advocates to uphold public trust. Despite the promising aspects, the study identifies current challenges in the implementation of AI in Indonesia. These challenges include the absence of a legal foundation, a scarcity of human resources, high costs associated with AI deployment, and a general lack of awareness among the public regarding the utilization of AI in the legal profession. Addressing these challenges is crucial to realizing the full potential of AI in advancing the accessibility and quality of free legal aid services in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Legal Basis and Challenges Of Ai Application In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Legal: Proposing Artificial Intelligence Application to Provide Free Legal Aid in Indonesia

Hakim,

Praja,

Setyaningrum

et al. 2024

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…/10.13180/icres.2018.20-21.08.017. 17 Evans et al, "Truthful AI";Yuwono Prianto, Viony Kresna Sumantri, and Paksi Yudha Sasmita, "Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject," in Proceedings of the Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2019) (Atlantis Press, 2020), https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200515.067.lying --the use of verbal falsehoods…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial Intelligence in the Auspices of Law: A Diverge Perspective

Hasibuan,

Aurelya Jessica Rawung,

Denisha M. D. Paranduk

et al. 2024

JMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artificial Intelligence (AI), encompassing computation for perception, reasoning, and action, poses complex legal considerations. This study explores AI’s impact and its legal ramifications, particularly its autonomy in communication and creation, raising concerns about language, intellectual property, and ethical accountability. Influenced by Common Law and Civil Law systems, discussions vary. Evaluating AI creator liability uncovers intricate connections between AI’s autonomy, intentionality, and creators’ roles. The approach used in this article are based on normative method with multidisciplinary discipline. The results are that though AI creators aren’t directly liable, vicarious liability could link actions to AI behaviors based on programming choices. Balancing innovation and accountability calibrated “creator immunities” are vital. Unchecked immunities could impede responsible AI development; measured immunities might encourage ethical practices, considering AI nuances and societal impacts. Positioning AI as a legal subject necessitates tailored approaches within ethical boundaries. The proposition of AI as a derivative legal subject while setting clear limits is pivotal. Adapting legal systems to evolving AI landscapes and reconciling advancement with societal well-being, is crucial. AI’s intricate accountability, its legal standing, and creator liabilities and immunities demand reshaping legal frameworks for an ethical AI environment. Abstrak Kecerdasan Buatan (AI), yang mencakup komputasi persepsi, penalaran, dan tindakan, menimbulkan pertimbangan hukum yang kompleks. Studi ini mengeksplorasi dampak AI dan konsekuensi hukumnya, terutama otonominya dalam komunikasi dan kreasi, yang menimbulkan kekhawatiran tentang bahasa, kekayaan intelektual, dan akuntabilitas etis. Melalui sistem Common Law dan Civil Law, pembahasannya pun beragam. Mengevaluasi pertanggungjawaban pencipta AI mengungkap hubungan yang rumit antara otonomi, kesengajaan, dan peran pencipta AI. Pendekatan yang digunakan didasarkan pada metode normatif dengan disiplin ilmu yang beragam. Hasilnya adalah bahwa meskipun pencipta AI tidak bertanggung jawab secara langsung, doktrin vicarious liability dapat menghubungkan tindakan dengan perilaku AI berdasarkan pilihanpemrograman. Menyeimbangkan inovasi dan akuntabilitas, kekebalan pencipta yang terukur sangat penting. Kekebalan yang tidak terkendali dapat menghambat pengembangan AI yang bertanggung jawab; kekebalan yang terukur dapat mendorong praktik-praktik etis, dengan mempertimbangkan nuansa AI dan dampak sosial. Memosisikan AI sebagai subjek hukum memerlukan pendekatan yang disesuaikan dengan batasan etika. Proposisi AI sebagai subjek hukum turunan sambil menetapkan batasan yang jelas sangat krusial. Mengadaptasi sistem hukum dengan lanskap AI yang terus berkembang dan menyelaraskan kemajuan dengan kesejahteraan masyarakat, sangatlah vital. Pertanggungjawaban AI yang rumit, kedudukan hukumnya, dan kewajiban serta kekebalan pencipta menuntut pembentukan kembali kerangka kerja hukum untuk lingkungan AI yang etis.

show abstract

Robo-Rage Against the Machine: Abuse, Sabotage, and Bullying of Robots and Autonomous Vehicles

Oravec

2022

Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Smart Legal: Proposing Artificial Intelligence Application to Provide Free Legal Aid in Indonesia

Smart Legal: Proposing Artificial Intelligence Application to Provide Free Legal Aid in Indonesia

Artificial Intelligence in the Auspices of Law: A Diverge Perspective

Robo-Rage Against the Machine: Abuse, Sabotage, and Bullying of Robots and Autonomous Vehicles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About