2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pros and cons of furrow irrigation on smallholdings in northeast Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of a longer basin (200 m) impacts the operative cost reduction with a mild increase on distribution uniformity. This study showed that the size of the plots has a significant impact on irrigation development, namely that small-sized fields constrain the on-farm water distribution and the pathway to the irrigation automation to reduce labour requirements, a problem also discussed by Araujo et al [33]. The level basins or the graded borders with the lengths of 200 m allowed the highest IWP and EWPR, but these solutions require land reparcelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The effect of a longer basin (200 m) impacts the operative cost reduction with a mild increase on distribution uniformity. This study showed that the size of the plots has a significant impact on irrigation development, namely that small-sized fields constrain the on-farm water distribution and the pathway to the irrigation automation to reduce labour requirements, a problem also discussed by Araujo et al [33]. The level basins or the graded borders with the lengths of 200 m allowed the highest IWP and EWPR, but these solutions require land reparcelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The increase in discharge increased flow velocity and the furrow wetter perimeter and consequently increased soil losses. Araujo et al (2019) also reported that higher inflow rates caused larger losses of water and soil through runoff in furrow irrigation in the Curu‐Pentecoste irrigation scheme located in the state of Ceara, Brazil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Adviento‐Borbe et al (2018) reported that protective tillage could reduce nutrient (ammonium, nitrate, nitrite and dissolved phosphorus) losses due to runoff in the furrow irrigated areas of North Arkansas. Araujo et al (2019) investigated the amount of runoff and soil losses in furrow irrigation under different inflow rates and soil textures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of water resources, high water consumption, and inadequate flood irrigation have significantly reduced yield and quality. Furrow irrigation poses some important environmental problems; nutrient leaching, higher erosion (Seeda et al, 2020), and runoff in the experimental sites represented up to 70% of the applied water (ranging from 20 to 70%) (Araujo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Plant Height Of Cornmentioning
confidence: 99%