Prosecuting the War Crime of Collective Punishment: Is It Time to Amend the Rome Statute?

Darcy, Shane

doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp083

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We used home demolition as our target case as it is official policy and therefore unlikely that participants would deny that the harmdoing occurred, or would discount it as the work of a few law-breakers. Although this policy of home demolition is widely supported among Jewish-Israelis—80% support the policy (Peace Index, 2015)—it goes against a strong international norm that prohibits harming one person for another’s crime (Darcy, 2010). Interestingly, most Israelis (53%) oppose demolishing the family home of an Israeli who has murdered Palestinians for nationalistic reasons (Peace Index, 2015), suggesting double standards.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exposure to Analogous Harmdoing Increases Acknowledgment of Ingroup Transgressions in Intergroup Conflicts

Shulman

Halperin

Kessler

et al. 2020

Pers Soc Psychol Bull

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A major barrier to the resolution of intergroup conflicts is the reluctance to acknowledge transgressions committed by one’s ingroup toward the outgroup. Existing research demonstrates that individuals are generally motivated to justify ingroup conduct and avoid experiencing guilt and shame about ingroup harmdoing. The current work explores the use of an analogy-based intervention to attenuate motivated reasoning in evaluations of ingroup harmdoing. Overall, across six studies, we find support for our hypothesis that considering a case of harmdoing in a removed context increases acknowledgment of an analogous case of ingroup harmdoing. We further explore why, and under what conditions, the analogy is effective in leading to increased acknowledgment of an ingroup transgression. We find that the effect of the analogy is mediated by the endorsement of moral principles specific to the domain of the transgression, suggesting that the mechanism involves a cognitive process of analogical reasoning.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exposure to Analogous Harmdoing Increases Acknowledgment of Ingroup Transgressions in Intergroup Conflicts

Shulman

Halperin

Kessler

et al. 2020

Pers Soc Psychol Bull

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Targeted and collective punishments are both widely used forms of punishment, including in the classroom (e.g., Cushman et al, 2012 ; Darcy, 2010 ; Selman & Dray, 2006 ). A large body of work has examined how collective punishment is used ( Hechter, 1990 ), its effectiveness ( Chapkovski, 2021 ), and how people view collective punishment ( Heckathorn, 1990 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second is a collective punishment, where the entire group is disciplined for the actions of an individual or a smaller subgroup ( Smith & Warneken, 2016 ). Although our common moral understanding (at least in many Western societies) as well as most existing psychological theories of moral judgment call for targeted punishment, wherein only those causally responsible for the transgression are punished ( Cushman, 2015 ), collective punishment nonetheless occurs in a variety of contexts, including crime ( Nakao & Chai, 2011 ), war ( Darcy, 2010 ) and sports ( Cushman et al, 2012 ). As such, it is important to study how targeted versus collective punishment is perceived from early in development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

No one is going to recess: How children evaluate collective and targeted punishment

Thomas,

Kelsey,

Vaish

2024

Social Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined children's responses to targeted and collective punishment. Thirty‐six 4–5‐year‐olds and 36 6–7‐year‐olds (36 females; 54 White; data collected 2018–2019 in the United States) experienced three classroom punishment situations: Targeted (only transgressing student punished), Collective (one student transgressed, all students punished), and Baseline (all students transgressed, all punished). The older children evaluated collective punishment as less fair than targeted, whereas younger children evaluated both similarly. Across ages, children distributed fewer resources to teachers who administered collective than targeted punishment, and rated transgressors more negatively and distributed fewer resources to transgressors in Collective and Targeted than Baseline. These findings demonstrate children's increasing understanding of punishment and point to the potential impact of different forms of punishment on children's social lives.

show abstract

“…Al respecto, este procedimiento de enmiendas ha sido calificado como "complejo y extremadamente engorroso" 38 y cualquier enmienda exitosa solo se aplicaría a los Estados que la acepten. (Darcy, 2010).…”

unclassified

“…Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres. Darcy, S. (2010). Prosecuting the war crime of collective punishment is it time to amend the Rome Statute?…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Glosario de justicia internacional penal

Sánchez¹,

Cedeño²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prosecuting the War Crime of Collective Punishment: Is It Time to Amend the Rome Statute?

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Exposure to Analogous Harmdoing Increases Acknowledgment of Ingroup Transgressions in Intergroup Conflicts

Exposure to Analogous Harmdoing Increases Acknowledgment of Ingroup Transgressions in Intergroup Conflicts

No one is going to recess: How children evaluate collective and targeted punishment

Glosario de justicia internacional penal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About