2011
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2011.39.10.1337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosocial Personality Traits and Adaptation to Stress

Abstract: Evidence suggests that personality traits may play a significant role in individual differences in cortisol reactivity in stressful situations. In this study, cortisol responses to public speaking were examined to test hypotheses that reactivity would be positively related to openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, and negatively to extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism, respectively. A sample of 75 students (56 women and 19 men) completed the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, high levels of Neuroticism have been associated both with increased responses (Habra, Linden, Anderson, & Weinberg, ; Houtman & Bakker, ) and with blunted cortisol responses (LeBlanc & Ducharme, ; Oswald et al., ; Phillips, Carroll, Burns, & Drayson, ). With regard to Conscientiousness, associations seem to be a bit more consistent: Either no consistent association was found (e.g., Oldehinkel, Hartman, Nederhof, Riese, & Ormel, ; Oswald et al., ) or higher Conscientiousness was related to enhanced cortisol responses (Garcia‐Banda et al., ; Oldehinkel et al., ). Given our earlier argument that HPA‐axis reactivity reflects effort, it may be plausible that the previously reported inconsistent findings between stress reactivity and personality traits (i.e., the positive as well as the negative associations that have been reported for various traits) mainly reflect some fluctuation around the nonsignificant relation between personality and stress‐induced HPA‐axis reactivity.…”
Section: Measures Of Hpa‐axis Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, high levels of Neuroticism have been associated both with increased responses (Habra, Linden, Anderson, & Weinberg, ; Houtman & Bakker, ) and with blunted cortisol responses (LeBlanc & Ducharme, ; Oswald et al., ; Phillips, Carroll, Burns, & Drayson, ). With regard to Conscientiousness, associations seem to be a bit more consistent: Either no consistent association was found (e.g., Oldehinkel, Hartman, Nederhof, Riese, & Ormel, ; Oswald et al., ) or higher Conscientiousness was related to enhanced cortisol responses (Garcia‐Banda et al., ; Oldehinkel et al., ). Given our earlier argument that HPA‐axis reactivity reflects effort, it may be plausible that the previously reported inconsistent findings between stress reactivity and personality traits (i.e., the positive as well as the negative associations that have been reported for various traits) mainly reflect some fluctuation around the nonsignificant relation between personality and stress‐induced HPA‐axis reactivity.…”
Section: Measures Of Hpa‐axis Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of studies failed to find an association between physiological reactivity and neuroticism and/or extraversion (e.g. Arnetz & Fjellner, 1986;Garcia-Banda et al, 2011;Glass, Lake, Contrada, Kehoe, & Erlanger, 1983;Kirschbaum, Bartussek, & Strasburger, 1992;Schommer, Kudielka, Hellhammer, & Kirschbaum, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strand of the wider program of research mentioned above involved exploration of detailed cortisol profiles in relation to personality and in particular Neuroticism as a possible stress vulnerability trait (Garcia-Banda et al 2011;Garcia-Banda et al 2014). While we had no firm hypothesis in this study in regard to the possible modulation of any intervention effects by Neuroticism, the availability of these data allowed us to include Neuroticism along with sex, age and smoking status in subsidiary analyses to demonstrate if necessary that any obtained stress reduction effects were independent of these individual difference variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%