2016 10th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iscslp.2016.7918491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic cues in polite and rude Mandarin speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Chinese, however, pitch variation is reserved for distinguishing lexical meaning and prosodic boundaries but is not normally utilised to convey pragmatic meaning (Peng et al, 2005). Existing research on pragmatic prosodic cues in Chinese (Fan & Gu, 2016;Gu et al, 2011) proves that politeness is…”
Section: Politeness Cues In Teacher Directives In Russianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chinese, however, pitch variation is reserved for distinguishing lexical meaning and prosodic boundaries but is not normally utilised to convey pragmatic meaning (Peng et al, 2005). Existing research on pragmatic prosodic cues in Chinese (Fan & Gu, 2016;Gu et al, 2011) proves that politeness is…”
Section: Politeness Cues In Teacher Directives In Russianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case with Korean (Shin, 2005;Winter & Grawunder, 2012), Taiwanese Mandarin (Lin et al, (2006), German (Grawunder et al, 2014), and Catalan (Hübscher et al, 2018). However, there are also many other acoustic variables that can index polite speech, including low intensity (e.g., Culpeper et al, 2003;Idemaru et al, 2020), longer speech duration (e.g., Fan & Gu, 2016;Navarro & Cabedo Nebot, 2014;Ofuka et al, 2000), and voice quality features (Hübscher et al, 2018;Idemaru et al, 2019;Winter & Grawunder, 2012), among others. This suggests that politenessrelated meanings are signaled not just by one cue alone, but by a complex web of acoustic cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%