Interspeech 2013 2013
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2013-761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic cues of sarcastic speech in French: slower, higher, wider

Abstract: Verbal irony is characterized by the use of specific acoustic modulations, especially global prosodic cues as well as vowel hyperarticulation. Little is known concerning the expression of sarcastic speech in French. Here we report on global prosodic features of sarcastic speech in a corpus of declarative French utterances. Our data show that sarcastic productions are characterized by utterance lengthening, by increased f 0 modulations and a global raising of the pitch level and range. The results are discussed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear mixed-effects regression models with crossed random intercepts for speaker and sentence showed a significant effect of the condition on the speech rate (nonironic vs. ironic = 0.17, SE = 0.05, p < .001), but not on the pitch range (nonironic vs. ironic = 21.1, SE = 26.5, p = .43). Regarding the pitch range, previous studies have reported contradictory findings: while some studies found a larger pitch range in the ironic condition compared to the nonironic condition (e.g., Anolli et al, 2000; Lœvenbruck et al, 2013), other studies reported the opposite (e.g., Cheang & Pell, 2008; Niebuhr, 2014), or that the effect did not reach a significant level (Bryant & Fox Tree, 2005). Our results are in line with the last finding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Linear mixed-effects regression models with crossed random intercepts for speaker and sentence showed a significant effect of the condition on the speech rate (nonironic vs. ironic = 0.17, SE = 0.05, p < .001), but not on the pitch range (nonironic vs. ironic = 21.1, SE = 26.5, p = .43). Regarding the pitch range, previous studies have reported contradictory findings: while some studies found a larger pitch range in the ironic condition compared to the nonironic condition (e.g., Anolli et al, 2000; Lœvenbruck et al, 2013), other studies reported the opposite (e.g., Cheang & Pell, 2008; Niebuhr, 2014), or that the effect did not reach a significant level (Bryant & Fox Tree, 2005). Our results are in line with the last finding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The acoustic analyses of the speech material focused on two features that several previous studies have shown to be relevant for the acoustics of irony: speech rate and pitch range (e.g., Anolli et al, 2000, 2002; Cheang & Pell, 2008, 2009; Lœvenbruck et al, 2013; Niebuhr, 2014; Rockwell, 2000). To calculate the speech rate, the number of syllables in the sentence (between 6 and 11) was divided by the duration of the spoken sentence as measured in seconds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, research in various languages shows different results regarding the role of lexical markers and acoustic parameters. For example, Loevenbruck et al (2013) have analyzed the prosodic quality of irony in French and found both similarities and differences regarding the pitch level between French and English and German. A similar analysis was carried out for irony in Dutch by Jansen and Chen (2020).…”
Section: Bi-and Multilingualism and Verbal Irony Use And Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discovered that some particular intensity and pitch contours are indicative of sarcastic speech. Vocal cues were utilized by Rockwell et al [25] in order to detect sarcasm. Their results indicated that intense low-pitched utterance with slow cadence has higher probability of being sarcastic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%