2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00109-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in English and Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
276
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
276
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The examples may seem trite, but micro-domains can be very useful for gathering data on how human-like features are received. Nigel Ward's humming machine (Ward & Tsukahara, 2000) is an example of a machine that can potentially make a human believe she is talking to another human, if presented in an appropriate context -like a telephone conversation where one person does most of the talking. Apart from the novelty value, however, such a machine goes a long way to test models of where to produce backchannels -the reason the machine was designed in the first place.…”
Section: Micro-domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examples may seem trite, but micro-domains can be very useful for gathering data on how human-like features are received. Nigel Ward's humming machine (Ward & Tsukahara, 2000) is an example of a machine that can potentially make a human believe she is talking to another human, if presented in an appropriate context -like a telephone conversation where one person does most of the talking. Apart from the novelty value, however, such a machine goes a long way to test models of where to produce backchannels -the reason the machine was designed in the first place.…”
Section: Micro-domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noticed three phenomena. First, in some dialogs the operator seemed to actively solicit acknowledgements, prosodically (Ward & Tsukahara 2000), which seemed to drive the dialog faster. Second, in some dialogs the operator paused after every digit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cues have been analysed extensively. It has been found that acoustic features [9,12,22], syntactic information [9,12], gaze [3], as well as head gestures [10] play a role in eliciting feedback responses from listeners. The mechanism used to identify feedback elicitation cues used in these studies, however, is problematic for two reasons.…”
Section: Feedback Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%