2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
180
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
180
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results, together with the ones presented here, should have important consequences for the pedagogical methods used for foreign language learning. Based upon the growing evidence pointing to the importance of prosody for language comprehension (Frazier et al, 2006), it may prove useful to develop learning programs relying on the spoken form of languages. Musical training may be particularly useful in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such results, together with the ones presented here, should have important consequences for the pedagogical methods used for foreign language learning. Based upon the growing evidence pointing to the importance of prosody for language comprehension (Frazier et al, 2006), it may prove useful to develop learning programs relying on the spoken form of languages. Musical training may be particularly useful in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) method, known for its excellent temporal resolution, is particularly well suited to this aim. Here, we used the ERPs to determine whether musicians are more efficient than nonmusicians to perceive prosody, a central aspect of spoken language comprehension (Frazier, Carlson, & Clifton, 2006). At the acoustic level, prosody is defined by four acoustic parameters: fundamental frequency (F0), duration, intensity, and spectral characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ERP data have demonstrated that in adults prosodic information influences syntactic parsing very fast, that is in a very early phase during speech comprehension (Eckstein and Friederici, 2006) and that the brain's sensitivity to prosodic features is present not only in adults (Pannekamp et al, 2005), but also in infants (Pannekamp et al, 2006). Psycholinguistic studies in adults (Marslen-Wilson et al, 1992;Warren et al, 1995) have provided evidence for an interaction of prosodic and syntactic processes during auditory language comprehension (Frazier et al, 2006), and psycholinguistic models of language acquisition state a strong reliance on prosodic information during early language processing (Weissenborn and Höhle, 2001). The shorter right than left BOLD latencies for children in our study seem to match these electrophysiological data and, moreover, are consistent with the psycholinguistic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As corpus analyses of the 40 verbs revealed an overall bias toward transitive use, and because we were interested in structural parsing preferences, we used the verbs in progressive aspect ("is approaching") rather than present or past tense ("approaches"/"approached"). Progressive verb forms have previously been shown to reduce such a transitivity bias without abolishing the structural garden-path effects (Frazier, Carlson, & Clifton, 2006). The 80 sentences in Conditions A (LC) and B (EC) were recorded by a male English native speaker in a sound-attenuating booth (44.1 kHz sampling rate, 16-bit amplitude resolution [Marantz digital recorder PMD670]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%