2021
DOI: 10.1075/lab.19076.aus
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology

Abstract: Second language (L2) learners are known to have difficulty producing inflection in obligatory contexts reliably. According to the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis (PTH), the prosodic organisation of L2 inflection is constrained by the inventory of representations available in the L1. At the same time, this hypothesis does not explicitly limit how freely prosodic representations can be transferred, so that transfer across constructions within the same domain (e.g., verbal domain: L1 tense → L2 agreement) and across… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that Goldschneider and DeKeyser (2001) presented a plausible hierarchical framework for the perceptual acuity and morphosyntactic learning, one promising enquiry concerns the extent to which L2 learners with different levels of auditory processing abilities master L2 morphosyntax with different levels of perceptual salience (e.g., sonority). There is a possibility that individual AUDITORY PROCESSING & VOCABULARY differences in auditory processing (a core component of phonology) may be integral to the acquisition of grammar which interfaces lexicon, morphology, and syntax (e.g., inflection; Austin, Chang, Kim, & Daly, 2021) and semantics and discourse (e.g., articles;Demuth & McCullough, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that Goldschneider and DeKeyser (2001) presented a plausible hierarchical framework for the perceptual acuity and morphosyntactic learning, one promising enquiry concerns the extent to which L2 learners with different levels of auditory processing abilities master L2 morphosyntax with different levels of perceptual salience (e.g., sonority). There is a possibility that individual AUDITORY PROCESSING & VOCABULARY differences in auditory processing (a core component of phonology) may be integral to the acquisition of grammar which interfaces lexicon, morphology, and syntax (e.g., inflection; Austin, Chang, Kim, & Daly, 2021) and semantics and discourse (e.g., articles;Demuth & McCullough, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the L2ers, stress showed effects potentially attributable to the L1, with a reduction in subject antecedents. In the context of the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis, which demonstrates transfer for word-and phrase-level prosody (e.g., Austin et al, 2022;Goad & White, 2019, 2024, our results point to the possibility that prosodic transfer is also found at the sentence level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%